Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

by **evil_monkey** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:28 pm

jake_twothousandfive wrote:But do the Colts even need an offensive lineman? That was my main problem with that pick.

Same goes for the pats, OL is solid and all under multi year contracts, no way do they take one in the first round.

by **killiansjmd** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:32 pm

I don't think the Jets will go O-line either in the first round again this year. They have greater needs on the D-line, secondary and at RB.

by **steelerfan513** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:39 pm

I think I just got dumber after reading that. :-B

3, 7, and 9 and just plain stupid. If Cleveland takes a defensive lineman, they'll take Alan Branch, who is a much better fit in a 4-3. The Vikings traded up to get Tavaris Jackson in the second round last year; no way they take a QB in the first. And Miami has many more pressing needs than wide receiver.

Then they have Carolina taking a wide receiver. They have Steve Smith; he's two wide receivers rolled up into one. Drew Carter or Keyshawn will do just fine as a #2.

Who exactly is Craig Davis? I highly doubt LSU will have 2 receivers go in the first round.

I have doubts about Adam Carriker falling to 30th, and I don't think he's a great fit in San Diego. He has the flexibility to play any position on a 4-3 line, but only a defensive end on a 3-4 line.

I also don't see the Jets taking another offensive lineman in the first round. They took 2 last year.

Really not a good mock at all. These guys obviously didn't do their research.

by **deerayfan072** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:45 pm

The guy who runs PFT is a lawyer who knows people in the sports world. He is good for rumors about trades/ hirings/ stuff like that, but football analysis is not his fortay

by **FantasyMan13** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:00 pm

Ehh, give the guy some credit for being different.

by **mrblitz** » Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:21 pm

I don't agree with alot of it either. If they only knew about the Cafe. :-b

by **madaslives911** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:51 am

FantasyMan13 wrote:Ehh, give the guy some credit for being different.

mystykoekaki · by **mystykoekaki** » Tue Feb 13, 2007 4:15 pm

jake_twothousandfive wrote:they have the Vikings going with Quinn even though Childress has said time and time again that he is happy with his quarterbacks.

I think he said that fully beliving that Quinn would not fall to the number 7th spot. If he did, he WOULD pull the trigger!

Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

PFT.com Mock Draft

Re: PFT.com Mock Draft

Re: PFT.com Mock Draft

Who is online