logan wrote:Kilroy1872 wrote:logan wrote:i really wouldn't mind seeing the chiefs pick up carr if trent is indeed dealt. he would be the most experienced guy on the roster as far as game time goes. with a solid running game and decent o line he could do just as good if not better than croyle/huard.
I gotta disagree with that. Huard showed the ability to do something last year that Carr hasn't shown with any consistency in his entire career. The ability to win football games.
QB isn't the problem in KC. The problem is that the QB doesn't have anyone to throw the ball to.
i'm not going to argue that huard wasn't decent last year because he was and i'm sure he would do a serviceable job but that 11 and 1 td int ratio is making him look a whole lot better than he really is. if he had that much talent he would be riding the bench his whole career.
do i think carr would be some sort of saviour? no but atleast if something were to happen to huard if he ends up starting it wouldn't be on croyle's shoulders only. in the event huard gets down than the backup to croyle would then becomes casey printers. not really a ideal situation.
Honestly, Huard reminds me a bit of Brad Johnson. Talent doesn't knock your socks off, backup for a while, but when given the opportunity gets the job done, and most importantly doesn't shoot himself (or his team) in the foot. That type of QB may not lead off Sportscenter, but he can get your team to the playoffs, and in my opinion there are far better places the Chiefs can expend cap space than by pursuing Carr.