joelamosobadiah wrote: madaslives911 wrote:
Jimboozie wrote:Go with the granola.
Since Urlacher never won a Super Bowl and wasn't much of a pimp in SB XLI, I have to vote for A. Besides, I like A better anyways.
if Urlacher never won a Super Bowl and this is part of the criteria, then there is a technicality here... so, would that mean that B is disqualified?
Deluxe would have to answer that.
yeah, when i set this poll up in a hurry on my lunch today (even hurrying i was 25 minutes late getting back to work), i didnt even pay attention to what was in the sig since i was so rushed, and the urlacher was submitted today so its not like ive been sitting on it.
my only real option here will be to PM each member in the tourney to ask whether it be allowed, or if it should be DQ'd/penalized, or if people have another option (maybe both guys advancing if urlacher ends up winning has been suggested). i honestly dont care to put this decision on my own shoulders as im no better than anyone else in this thing and i think it shoud be a decision as a group. i will say, i asked thefranchise to make a completely new sig mid week because he made a mcnabb one.
PMs have been sent to all participants that havent already PMd me about it...should have some sort of resolution soon.