When I first read this article I was interested, because stuff like the Loch Ness Monster interests me, but then I watched the video and I'm not so sure. Seems like a wave to me, not a monster.
EDINBURGH, Scotland (AP) -- Like tartan, bagpipes, and shortbread Scotland's Loch Ness Monster is as much an emblem as a tourist draw.
And now Nessie's back.
An amateur scientist has captured what Loch Ness Monster watchers say is among the finest footage ever taken of the elusive mythical creature reputed to swim beneath the waters of Scotland's most mysterious lake.
"I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw this jet black thing, about 45-feet (15 meters) long, moving fairly fast in the water," said Gordon Holmes, the 55-year-old a lab technician from Shipley, Yorkshire, who took the video this past Saturday.
He said it moved at about 6 mph (10 kph) and kept a fairly straight course.
"My initial thought is it could be a very big eel, they have serpent-like features and they may explain all the sightings in Loch Ness over the years."
Loch Ness is surrounded by myth and mystery, as it is the largest and deepest inland expanse of water in Britain. About 750 feet (230 meters) to the bottom, it's even deeper than the North Sea.
Nessie watcher and marine biologist Adrian Shine of the Loch Ness 2000 center in Drumnadrochit, on the shores of the lake, viewed the video and hopes to properly analyze it in the coming months.
"I see myself as a skeptical interpreter of what happens in the loch, but I do keep an open mind about these things and there is no doubt this is some of the best footage I have seen," Shine said.
He said the video is particularly useful because Holmes panned back to get the background shore into the shot. That means it was less likely to be a fake and provided geographical bearings allowing one to calculate how big the creature was and how fast it was traveling.
While many sightings can be attributed to a drop of the local whisky, legends of Scottish monsters date back to one of the founders of the Christian church in Scotland, St. Columba, who wrote of them in about 565 A.D.
More recently, there have been more than 4,000 purported Nessie sightings since she was first caught on camera by a surgeon on vacation in the 1930s.
Since then, the faithful have speculated whether it is a completely unknown species, a sturgeon -- even though they have not been native to Scotland's waters for many years -- or even a last surviving dinosaur.
Shine doubts that last explanation.
"There are a number of possible explanations to the sightings in the loch. It could be some biological creature, it could just be the waves of the loch or it could be some psychological phenomenon in as much as we see what we want to see," he said.
But Nessie isn't just an icon of the paranormal -- she's also an emblem of Scottish tourism. She has been the muse for cuddly toys and immortalized on T-shirts and posters showing her classic three-humped image.
The Scottish media is skeptical of Nessie stories but Holmes' footage is of such good quality that even the normally reticent BBC Scotland aired the video on its main news program on Tuesday.
joelamosobadiah wrote:Don't you think that with all of the technology that we have available to us we would have found something if there were something to find.
That is how I feel. I think it is all for show, amybe even tourism.
joelamosobadiah wrote:Don't you think that with all of the technology that we have available to us we would have found something if there were something to find.
That is how I feel. I think it is all for show, amybe even tourism.
I agree too. As much as I'd like there to be something in the Loch, there isn't. It'd have been found by now.
Think of the proliferation of cameras, digital cameras, disposable cameras, camcorders, cell phone video recorders, etc, etc, etc.
If there was something there it would have been photographed, video taped or something by now, and not these grainy, half visible maybe-something videos and pictures we always end up seeing. There’d be conclusive proof by now. There would almost have to be. And that’s not to even mention the super-expensive research tools that governments and universities have available to them that the common man has no access to.
Same thing goes for Sasquatch, UFOs, and other mystery stuff like them. I’d love to see any of these things proven true, just because it would be so interesting to find them. But the fact is that with all the methods of personal recording devices we have available today, it would have been done by now if these things existed. So odds are they don’t.
But they’re still interesting, if for nothing else than to talk about the people who truly believe in this stuff. They make good chat fodder.