knapplc wrote:FatFoot wrote:
Yeah... because you know right now that he's wrong........... uh-huh. You've both got a 50% shot at being right. From now to January there are roughly one million different factors that will go in to who is the better QB between Grossman and Romo, and about 990,000 of them have next to nothing to do with either guy. They could get hurt in a freak accident, they could get food poisoning and have a horrible game, any one of the dozens of key players around either guy could get hurt or impaired, family issues could come up, hurricanes could destroy Texas Stadium.... the list goes on and on and on. Not all of the factors that go into making a QB good are readily apparent by watching them play.
So to say "this is one of those quotes that you bring back up on the forum in January" is one thing, and a lighthearted joke and everyone's cool with it now and we all get a good laugh, but if you actually do bring it back up in January (assuming things fall through the Plinko machine your way), that'll be pretty unimpressive.
Just a little free advice.
We'll...I didn't say anything about either being the better QB...
I said I would rather have Grossman than Romo...that means, all things considered..more likely to have massive natural disaster, spontaneous combustions, ect, as well as the football aspects of it I would want Grossman over Romo.
So I would be deserving of a little more credit than you portray if I'm right...and a lot less if I'm wrong.
So Plinko yes, but I've considered each plink the o will go.
Oh and for the record, chances of me bringing this back up in January are slim to none. I'm just not that type of guy.