Fantasy Football Cafe Forum

by **JoshDJays** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:46 am

Why do you guys think? It's in a non-ppr redraft 10 team league.

Is Brandon Jackson enough to give up for Randy Moss? Reason I ask that it's created quite a stir in the league and as commish I make the call and I wanted to see what you guys think.

by **aqua** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:33 am

I think it is fair. Brandon Jackson has the chance to be the starting RB in Green Bay and Moss is not the some Moss he was in Minnesota. He will still be good but Brady spreads the ball around and Moss has lost some ground. I'd let it through.

by **magicninjafingers** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:00 pm

No veto. Moss stinks and has barely seen the field in camp. Jackson is on par with Moss at this point.

by **aman74** » Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:38 pm

I don't think anything should be vetoed unless the trade is specifically trying to be underhanded, which is doubtful this early in the season.

by **Lofunzo** » Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:08 am

I don't have a problem with this deal.

by **FirstAnd99** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:08 pm

It's tough to veto this one, and probably wrong to do so. This trade doesnt actually sound that bad given that Jackson will more than likely be the starter in GB. One example of a vetoable trade would be one that I looked at on this board earlier tonight. That trade involved getting rid of TO for Bo Scaife in return!! Now that is one example where you would almost definitely pull the trigger and veto it as it is pretty apparrent that something fishy is going on there.

by **heelfan72** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 9:58 pm

I agree w/ what everyone has said. It's not vetoable.

by **Sarg2000** » Thu Aug 23, 2007 11:30 pm

It is not even close to being something that needs a vote. Your job is to protect against coersion and this isn't it. Don't abuse the power. I think its pretty fair anyway but just remember you Shouldn't stop stupid, just cheats.