2 trades both vetoed be league- Good call or bad??? WHIR

[AEMRICH]

12 team $$$$ redraft H2H- PPR
I'm the commish and have stated that i won't veto a trade in my league. We drafted on Tuesday and two trades have already been vetoed. What do you think??
Trade one
Brandon Jackson GB
for
Cedric Benson CHI

Trade TWO
Jerious Norwood
for
Kevin Jones

[Script-Ohio]

Why the hell would your league veto these trades? What a not-fun league to be in

[knapplc]

I would do both votes over again, and this time I would announce that no votes will be counted that are not explained. Make them tell you why they're voting against the trade. If they give you BS reasons, override the veto and put both trades through.

There is nothing wrong with those trades. I can't think of many reasons why either should be vetoed.


Good luck to you this season. With owners like that, you're probably going to need it.

[PHI]

I would do both votes over again, and this time I would announce that no votes will be counted that are not explained. Make them tell you why they're voting against the trade. If they give you BS reasons, override the veto and put both trades through.

This is a good idea, and it wouldn't hurt to make this mandatory for all trades if you really want to keep the league voting system in place.

[Peacesells]

I believe that votes should not be allowed. Too many owners only look how the affects them from their perspective. The league I run I have final say on trades and I DON"T veto any trade unless I suspect some kind of collusion. Then I investigate. Everyone values players differently for different reasons. There is no way for you can expect the other members to understand what a trade means to the 2 parties involved so how can those members vote appropriately. Just do yourself a favor and get rid of the voting process.

Peace