SniperShot wrote:Umm... AFL?
Arent we talking about first 13 NFL starts?
AFL and NFL are totally different ballgames. If Romo has about as good or better stats than Warner and Warner had AFL experience doesn't that make a better case for Romo anyway???
I'm so confused.
This is my point exactly. I have no idea where the AFL came from. Like you, I am confused too.
Well I understand where AFL comes from seeing as Warner played in the AFL but somehow saying Warner was good in his early NFL career because he played in the AFL, thus you can't take stock in his early numbers is kinda dumb. AFL and NFL are totally different. The way offenses are run, defensive schemes, field size, there's not many comparisons that can be drawn between AFL football and NFL football which is why this is a fine comparison in my opinion.
In fact even if you say you can't compare Romo to Warner because Warner had an edge going into his first NFL game, that makes a much better case for Romo who has more
passing yards through 13 starts.