Omaha Red Sox wrote:josebach wrote:That's a little dramatic isn't it? Wouldn't it be a little more accurate to say the left is fighting for a woman's rights over that of an unborn baby? Do you think it's moral to force a 15 year rape victim against her will to carry a baby to term?
Who would it hurt to put the baby up for adoption?
Did you really read that?
You want to force a 15 year old girl, who was raped, to carry a rapist's baby in her body for 9 months? Suffer the physical changes to her body, possibly have health issues, shoulder the financial costs of being pregnant, and have a physical and constant reminder of the rape for at least 9 months? Tack on the embarrassment of the whole thing as well, as it's a wee bit hard to hide a pregnancy (not impossible, but not easy).
That is the very definition of "cruel and unusual punishment", and that's for something she wasn't even responsible for...