League Discussion

[flotsamnjetsam]

WaCoug must have been doing some late night drinking as well. He bid on EJ Williams after Kareighuis posted him.

[WaCougMBS]

WaCoug must have been doing some late night drinking as well. He bid on EJ Williams after Kareighuis posted him.

We were on the same wavelength, which under the circumstances is kind of terrifying

[Kareighuis]

I'm guessing that EJ Williams - LB, MIN is actually EJ Henderson - LB, MIN. You sure you weren't drinking?

I'm going to edit that post to read EJ Henderson...I double checked, and I didn't find any LB named Williams on MIN's roster. Please let me know if I'm right.

That wasn't me. Someone else was drinking.

Doh! My bad...it was Kareighuis.

Uh... oops? I can't even figure out what (or if) I was thinking...

WaCoug must have been doing some late night drinking as well. He bid on EJ Williams after Kareighuis posted him.

We were on the same wavelength, which under the circumstances is kind of terrifying

[Kareighuis]

I recall reading somewhere that if two franchises offer a contract for the same total amount, there were two tie-breakers. I can' recall what they were, and can't find the thread I thought they were in. Would it be possible to include the information in the rules thread?

[WaCougMBS]

I recall reading somewhere that if two franchises offer a contract for the same total amount, there were two tie-breakers. I can' recall what they were, and can't find the thread I thought they were in. Would it be possible to include the information in the rules thread?

viewtopic.php?t=324948

Contract tiebreakers are (in order):

1. Total contract amount
2. Average yearly salary

Why do you ask in this case?

[Kareighuis]

I recall reading somewhere that if two franchises offer a contract for the same total amount, there were two tie-breakers. I can' recall what they were, and can't find the thread I thought they were in. Would it be possible to include the information in the rules thread?

viewtopic.php?t=324948

Contract tiebreakers are (in order):

1. Total contract amount
2. Average yearly salary

Why do you ask in this case?

Ah ha! Thanks!

[flotsamnjetsam]

Brent Celek, TE, PHI
Contract Length: 3 Years
Total Contract Amount: $3M
Average Yearly Salary: $900K
2012-2014: $900K
NTC: No

This bid is not higher than the previous bid by terp (the "total contract amount" of $3.0M is lower than terp's ($3.4M)). PM sent.

[WaCougMBS]

Brent Celek, TE, PHI
Contract Length: 3 Years
Total Contract Amount: $3M
Average Yearly Salary: $900K
2012-2014: $900K
NTC: No

This bid is not higher than the previous bid by terp (the "total contract amount" of $3.0M is lower than terp's ($3.4M)). PM sent.

Plus this one only adds up to $2.7M in the year-by-year breakdown

[flotsamnjetsam]

Brent Celek, TE, PHI
Contract Length: 3 Years
Total Contract Amount: $3M
Average Yearly Salary: $900K
2012-2014: $900K
NTC: No

This bid is not higher than the previous bid by terp (the "total contract amount" of $3.0M is lower than terp's ($3.4M)). PM sent.

Plus this one only adds up to $2.7M in the year-by-year breakdown

Nice catch...I didn't even look past $3M not beating $3.4M. I edited my PM to Bradford to point that out as well.

EDIT: The year-by-year breakdown is actually correct...the total contract amount should be $2.7M (3 x $900K). I'm guessing that Bradford thought he had the higher bid because his avg yearly salary was higher.

[WaCougMBS]

This bid is not higher than the previous bid by terp (the "total contract amount" of $3.0M is lower than terp's ($3.4M)). PM sent.

Plus this one only adds up to $2.7M in the year-by-year breakdown

Nice catch...I didn't even look past $3M not beating $3.4M. I edited my PM to Bradford to point that out as well.

EDIT: The year-by-year breakdown is actually correct...the total contract amount should be $2.7M (3 x $900K). I'm guessing that Bradford thought he had the higher bid because his avg yearly salary was higher.

That's what I was thinking - either way something was off. I wonder if he meant for a fourth year at that rate, which would have been kosher