Could be. It's hard to say just how good Vijay and Phil and Ernie and Sergio or anyone else is at this point. I suppose you can compare scores from across eras if you compare the cut of the rough, course length and whatnot, and gauge the kind of competition that Tiger is facing compared to Nicklaus or Palmer, but I don't know if that would be accurate enough?
Tiger is just mentally tough, and clearly he has that edge over his opponents to a huge degree. I was pulling for Rocco because he's a cool "everyman" but at the same time, Tiger's career is so historic that it's a treat to watch.
How 'bout them Huskers!