Bad trade, should it get vetoed? - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Commissioner's Corner

Bad trade, should it get vetoed?

Moderator: Football Moderators

Re: Bad trade, should it get vetoed?

Postby LS2throwed » Fri Sep 19, 2008 1:08 am

I was looking for an explanation as to why this should get vetoed? Maroney and Jordan are both out and Morris looks like the back to have in that backfield, Campbell could very well be an upgrade over Garrard, and Royal is for real and has played very well...It needs to be collusion to be vetoed, Steve Smith for Greg Lewis is collusion, nothing wrong with this deal at all.
Image
Current Cafe Dynasties:
4th and Goal
Fourth & Inches
Double D
Any Given Dynasty
Eat Cheese Dynasty
NFL's Finest
Cafe Very Special Forces
LS2throwed
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

CafeholicFantasy ExpertCafe WriterCafe RankerMock(ing) DrafterCafe Musketeer
Posts: 5373
Joined: 21 Sep 2006
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Arlington, Texas

Re: Bad trade, should it get vetoed?

Postby PhillyEagle » Mon Sep 22, 2008 6:19 pm

I honestly don't know which side of the deal is better. It's not even a bad trade IMO.
PhillyEagle
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff

User avatar

Posts: 220
Joined: 26 Sep 2007
Home Cafe: Football

Previous

Return to Commissioner's Corner

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 3:42 hours
(and 36 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact