shawngee03 wrote:spodog and seahorn....awesome how you two answer every one of these, and seem to come up w some new way to express the same answer every time. im going through every one just to see what you'll say next
and to anybody else who has been answering a lot of them...no offense that i didnt name you...those two just have pics that i recognize in each one
That may be because the correct answer to 99.9% of the dumb "is this trade vetoable" questions on the commish board is NO
Most leagues seem to suffer from a commish with Napolean syndrome or something where the commish feels he must stick his nose into every trade offer and pass judgement on the merits of the trade, acting as some type of an auditor to determine if the trade is equitable or not.
That isn't the commish's job. Unless a trade just reeks of collusion, which very few do, there is no reason to veto a trade and no reason to poll the entire Cafe to ask if a trade should be veto'd.
Maybe Seahorn and I recognize this truth. Hope the commish of your league does as well.