dust up including moss

[shawngee03]

one owner is dumping randy moss for holt and fargas. 15 team league w a flex so RBs are a high commodity. i see nothing wrong w it...as moss isnt even playable as of now. sure it could turn out badly if moss turns it around, but teh guy getting rid of moss is 1-2 and not looking so good

a couple of teh guys in the league think its terrible and are pleading that the commish veto. what do you think?

[bungle613]

2 non performing WR1 geting swapped and a RB who will get some points thrown in is fine by me.

[Script-Ohio]

nothing wrong with that

[grover99]

Looks fine to me.

[WhipperSnappers44]

I see nothing wrong with it either. Too many people these days try to veto everything if it doesn't involve them. Some trades are obvious by a far margin that there is some sort of collusion going on but let the trades go through unless there is a strong absolute sense that it's unfair.

This one needs and should go through ok!

WhipperSnappers44!!!

[spodog]

let it go

[shawngee03]

I see nothing wrong with it either. Too many people these days try to veto everything if it doesn't involve them. Some trades are obvious by a far margin that there is some sort of collusion going on but let the trades go through unless there is a strong absolute sense that it's unfair.

This one needs and should go through ok!

WhipperSnappers44!!!

i also dont understand the increasing amount of people wanting to veto every trade they dont see as exactly perfect. it seems liek people just veto for the sake of vetoing. it really irritates me in this league.

one guy openly says that he uses the veto as a tool to not let teams get better than his...and the best part is he thinks its ok to do so.