Owners complaining about trades...Please Advise

[JoshDMB61]

Ok..here are multiple trades that have been complained about over the course of the season..please tell me if you think any of these are vetoable. Team A and B are exclusive to that trade...not the same teams over and over

Week 2
Team A gives: Gates, T. Jones, M. Muhammad
Team B gives: Witten, McFadden, Boldin

Agree Team A got the better end of that....but much of this was centered around team B wanting Gates BAD and valuing Jones more than DMC

Week 4
Team A gives: Frank Gore, Marvin Harrison
Team B gives: Reggie Wayne, McFadden

Again...not sure why there is an issue here. Team A was strong at RB and weak at WR.

Week 5
Team A gives: Felix Jones, Mushin Muhammad
Team B gives: Brandon Jacobs, Desean Jackson

Team B has Marion Barber and expressed desperation for the handcuff

Week 6
Team A gives: Brandon Jacobs, Warrick Dunn,Desean Jackson
Team B gives: LT

Don't understand any issues here...

Appreciate the opinions. Remember...want to know if there is any reason for veto in any of these cases. (trades were upheld, I just want to hear from y'all)

[JasonSeahorn]

I wouldn't veto any of those trades. The week 5 one (Jacobs/Jackson for Felix/Muhammad) is the worst one of the bunch, but I still wouldn't veto it. The first two trades aren't that bad at all.

[shagworth]

Some of those trades obviously favor one side IMO. But, to say that these trades should be vetoed...no way. I see nothing collusive (is that a word?) about ANY of those trades.

[WaCougMBS]

Some of those trades obviously favor one side IMO. But, to say that these trades should be vetoed...no way. I see nothing collusive (is that a word?) about ANY of those trades.

Agreed.
Make another tick mark in the "no chance you can veto that trade, ever" column

[rodney57104]

everything looks kosher. and I'm not even Jewish

[bungle613]

I wouldn't veto any of those trades. The week 5 one (Jacobs/Jackson for Felix/Muhammad) is the worst one of the bunch, but I still wouldn't veto it. The first two trades aren't that bad at all.

my sentiments as well

[Bobbleheadrusty]

Team A and B are the same teams in each case right?

Because I see the problem if that is the case.


That week 5 trade was crap, and the rest are biased enough that I can definately see why people are complaining if "A" is constantly using "B" to upgrade his team.

[iwonmyleague.com]

To veto a trade it would have to be very extreme and no of those trades to me are that WAY out of whack...i mean some are better than others but until the end of the season you don't really know....who knows maybe some owners will be called a genius.

[spodog]

Some of those trades obviously favor one side IMO. But, to say that these trades should be vetoed...no way. I see nothing collusive (is that a word?) about ANY of those trades.

Agreed.
Make another tick mark in the "no chance you can veto that trade, ever" column

agreed

[flotsamnjetsam]

Team A and B are the same teams in each case right?

Because I see the problem if that is the case.

No, it says:

Team A and B are exclusive to that trade...not the same teams over and over