They changed the article! It was all about Muschamp taking the job, and didn't have that quote. That's ridiculous!
That's not really that uncommon. A lot of times articles will get updated as new information is gained, rather than writing an entirely new article. It's more efficient, more organized, and quicker.
They changed the article! It was all about Muschamp taking the job, and didn't have that quote. That's ridiculous!
That's not really that uncommon. A lot of times articles will get updated as new information is gained, rather than writing an entirely new article. It's more efficient, more organized, and quicker.
No, not like this. They materially changed the article, Flesh. They did a 180 on the story and failed to acknowledge it. There is a very big difference to the kind of fact-checking you're talking about and out-and-out changing the story.
knapplc wrote:No, not like this. They materially changed the article, Flesh. They did a 180 on the story and failed to acknowledge it. There is a very big difference to the kind of fact-checking you're talking about and out-and-out changing the story.
I seem to agree with your comments considerably more often since you're change in sig and avatar...
knapplc wrote:No, not like this. They materially changed the article, Flesh. They did a 180 on the story and failed to acknowledge it. There is a very big difference to the kind of fact-checking you're talking about and out-and-out changing the story.
I seem to agree with your comments considerably more often since you're change in sig and avatar...
knapplc wrote:No, not like this. They materially changed the article, Flesh. They did a 180 on the story and failed to acknowledge it. There is a very big difference to the kind of fact-checking you're talking about and out-and-out changing the story.
I seem to agree with your comments considerably more often since you're change in sig and avatar...
Where's your school spirit? I'm carrying you here!