Dynasty Trade

[water boy]

I'm in a 14team h2h2 dynasty league and i got offered this trade

I GET

Rosenfels, Sage MIN QB
Gore, Frank SFO RB
Sproles, Darren SDC RB
Caldwell, Andre CIN WR
Nedney, Joe SFO PK
Year 2009 Draft Pick 3.06

I GIVE

Favre, Brett FA QB
Jackson, Steven STL RB
Bruce, Isaac SFO WR
Gostkowski, Stephen NEP PK
Year 2009 Draft Pick 4.08












Bulger, Marc STL QB -
Favre, Brett FA QB - -
Hasselbeck, Matt SEA QB (P)
Leinart, Matt ARI QB
Faulk, Kevin NEP RB
Jackson, Steven STL RB
James, Edgerrin ARI RB
McAllister, Deuce NOS RB
Parker, Willie PIT RB
Taylor, Fred NEP RB
Williams, DeAngelo CAR RB
Boldin, Anquan ARI WR
Branch, Deion SEA WR
Bruce, Isaac SFO WR
Galloway, Joey NEP WR
Mason, Derrick BAL WR
Muhammad, Muhsin CAR WR
Owens, Terrell BUF WR -
Stallworth, Donte' CLE WR
Gates, Antonio SDC TE (Q)
Smith, L.J. PHI TE
Gostkowski, Stephen NEP PK
Buccaneers, Tampa Bay TBB Def
Cowboys, Dallas DAL Def

[Free Bagel]

So basically removing all the fluff this is Gore/Sproles for Jackson.

Most people have Jackson/Gore pretty close, so getting Sproles as the bonus would push that side over the top.

Personally, I really like Jackson and am not big on Sproles, so I wouldn't do it. But I certainly could not blame you for taking it.

[water boy]

i do like Jackson more i just wanted to get more imput to see if i was missing something here,

thanks,

[matttyl315]

With the slightly better draft pick, as well as the extra potential starter in Sproles, I say do it! How about looking at my dynasty trade, which now also has Gore in it?

[LoveBoatCaptain]

A 3rd round pick in the rookie draft compared to a 4th is absolute zilch. This is probably just his way of trying to get you to bite. A report came out today from St. Louis that they will be centering their offense around SJax after acquiring Jason Brown at Center and What-his-face at FB. Jackson is an injury risk every season, so I would probably go with the more reliable RB in Gore. However, I am with Free Bagel is regards of "Don't drink the Sproles Kool-Aid"... yet. I can't imagine they would franchise him again next year, and while it'd be suicide to expect Turner-esque numbers in 2010, you better believe somebody is going to give him a shot -- whether it be the Chargers or not.

Bottom line: I would accept, but maybe try to change the 3/4th rounders to 2/3rd.

[mrtexansfan]

This trade has more involved then meets the eye. Sage Rosenfells played solid for several years here in Houston but was never able to succeed prior to going to Houston.He may get and win the starting spot in Minn that remains to be seen but a young starting qb could put this deal over the top. On the other hand the loss of Gostkowski can't be overlooked either. losing a very good young PK on an offensive team like the Patriots for a much older PK on a team with all the questions the 49ers have is a significant loss for you. I would be inclined to say no to this trade.

[LoveBoatCaptain]

I disagree. I don't think you should ever not accept a trade because of a kicker.

Sage > Favre
Gore, Sproles = Jackson
Chatman > Bruce
3.06 > 4.08

[Indibuck]

I disagree. I don't think you should ever not accept a trade because of a kicker.

Sage > Favre
Gore, Sproles = Jackson
Chatman > Bruce
3.06 > 4.08

+1

Although I believe Gore/Sproles > Jackson, so it makes it an even better deal IMHO.

[Yianni2112]

I disagree. I don't think you should ever not accept a trade because of a kicker.

Sage > Favre
Gore, Sproles = Jackson
Chatman > Bruce
3.06 > 4.08

+1

Although I believe Gore/Sproles > Jackson, so it makes it an even better deal IMHO.

A excellent point by MrTexansfan
I've won back to back championships and one of the main reasons is because I drafted Gostkowski with my first pick which was in the third round (Dynasty League). Seeing that my roster was stacked I went with the best PK.
PK's and Defenses are the most underated positions in fantasy and when you have a PK who can average 10-11 points a game it gives you a big edge. I'll take Gostkowski's 157 points every year. Gostkowski and the Ravens were the positions that put me over the top. The year prior was Gostkowski and the Bears.Mind you LT and AP helped a bit as well and Manning and Moss

[LoveBoatCaptain]

A excellent point by MrTexansfan
I've won back to back championships and one of the main reasons is because I drafted Gostkowski with my first pick which was in the third round (Dynasty League). Seeing that my roster was stacked I went with the best PK.
PK's and Defenses are the most underated positions in fantasy and when you have a PK who can average 10-11 points a game it gives you a big edge. I'll take Gostkowski's 157 points every year. Gostkowski and the Ravens were the positions that put me over the top. The year prior was Gostkowski and the Bears.Mind you LT and AP helped a bit as well and Manning and Moss

???

What's the point in bragging about your team in someone's trade advice? Yay you.