2 Rodgers, Aaron QB GB 3 Manning, Peyton QB IND 4 Rivers, Philip QB SD
5 McNabb, Donovan QB PHI 6 Brady, Tom QB NE
7 Warner, Kurt QB ARI 8 Romo, Tony QB DAL 9 Schaub, Matt QB HOU 10 Palmer, Carson QB CIN 11 Hasselbeck, Matt QB SEA
12 Ryan, Matt QB ATL 12 Cassel, Matt QB KC 13 Cutler, Jay QB CHI
14 Roethlisberger, Ben QB PIT 15 Edwards, Trent QB BUF 16 Campbell, Jason QB WAS 17 Manning, Eli QB NYG 18 Orton, Kyle QB DEN 19 Bulger, Marc QB STL 20 Hill, Shaun QB SF
BGbootha
General Manager
Posts: 3830
Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Teaching is the Greatest Job in the World!!! (during the Summer)
Rivers is the most obvious guy to me to step back this year. Rivers threw TDs on 7% of his pass attempts. Most of the time guys are between 4-5.5. That and 8.4 yards per attempt is obscene. If he throws the ball the same amount of times that he did last year I'd expect the guy around 3,600 yards and 26 TDs or so.
Tom Brady, with the weaponry they have there, I would expect him over 4,000 yards and well into the 30's in TDs.
Azrael
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 8276
(Past Year: 21)
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Yards this season: 1
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Keeping da cafe sucka free for 9 years straight
There are four QBs that are consistently too high in all rankings. I'm guessing it has to do with their overall high-profile teams or the fact that people sometimes confuse real-life with fantasy. There four are:
Aaron Rodgers Philip Rivers Ben Roethlisberger Eli Manning
Given this, it appears neither of you fell into the Eli trap, but you did with the others to varying degrees. Otherwise these look pretty good.
biju wrote:There are four QBs that are consistently too high in all rankings. I'm guessing it has to do with their overall high-profile teams or the fact that people sometimes confuse real-life with fantasy. There four are:
Aaron Rodgers Philip Rivers Ben Roethlisberger Eli Manning
Given this, it appears neither of you fell into the Eli trap, but you did with the others to varying degrees. Otherwise these look pretty good.
FWIW it would be unlikely that i end up with any of my Top 5 QB's in a redraft
Dan Lambskin
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 7054
(Past Year: 1)
Joined: 20 Mar 2005
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: being a fan of the worst franchise in the NFL
What is "too high" for Aaron Rodgers and why do you think he's too high. What are the red flags with him? He seemed pretty consistent last year and his offense and coaches are in tact. I'm not sure how the guy can be much lower than the 5th QB off the board.
Azrael
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 8276
(Past Year: 21)
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Yards this season: 1
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Keeping da cafe sucka free for 9 years straight
What is "too high" for Aaron Rodgers and why do you think he's too high. What are the red flags with him? He seemed pretty consistent last year and his offense and coaches are in tact. I'm not sure how the guy can be much lower than the 5th QB off the board.
Well, a top 5 pick alone shouldn't have one quarter of their games with under 186 yds and a total of 4 TDs and 3 INTs in those four games. The only other QB ranked high that did this was Philip Rivers (who ended his four game stretch with 2 TDs and 4 INTs instead).
Given the running problems GB had last year and the fact that they were behind in all those games makes me wonder exactly how much his stats should decline this year. Given a decline in stats and the inconsistency Rodgers has, I don't see him being anything higher than about 7th or 8th.
I know that I'm not going to be the guy with Rodgers on my roster this year, that's for sure. I can see him being a value play in 2010 after a lot of people get burned this year, but not this year for me.
Looking at your rankings, I get the impression that you are overvaluing guys in stable/known situations and undervaluing guys in new/unknown situations.
Tom Brady broke the TD record the year before last, gets injured the following year in game 1, and this year he is ranked #6? Huh? I'm almost poised to take this guy in round 1. Drew Brees has been the most consistent high profile QB in the NFL for the past several years, but if Brady is on his game Brees won't even come close to touching the guy. And by your rankings, you have a guy in Phillip Rivers who had a career year in virtually every category last year, but continued to stay limited in attempts. This is a guy who we can pretty confidently predict will stay below 500 passes this year, and this year he could end up closer to 3400/25 just like Drew Brees saw in the same system before he moved onto the much more friendly New Orleans Payton offense. Why is last years production your model for the upcoming season?
I don't understand the lack of love for Matt Ryan by you or the lack of love for Carson Palmer in general. How are these guys considered more risky than Donovan McNabb (injury candidate, lack of rushing stats, benched last year) and Kurt Warner (walking body cast IMO). Matt Ryan is this years Carson Palmer (even #3 WR Harry Douglas is stepping up big time there) and Carson Palmer was a consensus top5 QB before he got injured last year, very similar to Tom Brady as the consensus #1 before injury. And then what about Jay Cutler? How can a guy like that be behind a guy like Matt Cassel. If Peyton Manning was traded to the Detroit Lions, do you suddenly drop him down into the nether regions behind guys like Chad Pennington? Matt Cassel is the ultimate give up pick. Talent counts for SOMETHING. Do yourself a favor, ignore what happened in 2008 and rethink so of these rankings. Do you really expect Phillip Rivers to outproduce Tom Brady in 2009? The real question is, will he even outproduce guys like Eli Manning and Ben Roethlisberger? Why is Matt Cassel ranked so highly? Dwayne Bowe is not Randy Moss and Scott Pioli is not Bill Belicheck.