WR. You'll have one of those four RBs, you'll land probably a top WR and then come back with another top WR. I like the late round RBs this year with their upside (LJ, Parker, Moreno, Lynch, McFadden).
First, I think your draft is a 3RR draft so if I'm wrong, this post won't make any sense.
While I like RBush as a boom or bust player this year I think you may be better suited going with a WR at 3.10 this year. To me there are about 15 top end WRs and then a huge logjam of talent after that point. If for some reason the top 15 WRs are all gone by 3.10, then I'd go ahead and take RBush if that's where your heart is. But if I had to bet, I would bet that a few of the top 15 WR will make it back to you at 3.10 and I can assure you they won't make it back to you at 4.10.
So assuming some of them do make it to 3.10, I think you'll be better off taking one of the top 15 WRs and then taking the best RB available at 4.10. Just going off the FFCalc's ADP data, you could have either RBush(3.10)/BEdwards or AGonzo (4.10) compared to WWelker or Housh or Marshall(3.10)/DMac or Ward or Moreno(4.10). In my eyes, I would rather have the second options for a few reasons.
1) BEdwards may not fall to 4.10 and after him, there is another clear drop off at WR. 2) Welker, Housh, and Marshall are the worst case scenarios for your WR at 3.10 and I feel confident saying that at least 2 of the 3 will definitely be there for you to choose from. And those guys seem to be safer picks than the WRs you will get at 4.10. 3) The production of the RBs that you could get with pick 4.10 could easily eclipse RBush's production and I think that all of the RBs including RBush have the same risk associated with them in terms of production. The only difficult thing is deciding which one you like the best. 4) Since it's a PPR, I don't see RBush falling to 4.10 but I do think that even in a PPR, taking him at 3.10 is still a bit of a reach considering the durability concerns.
So I would say that at 3.10, you almost have to go with a WR
dmacblue wrote:Guys...thank you all for your valued input.
I am such a fool though, i meant to type 3.3 not 3.10
1.3........ Forte 2.10........ White 3.3.......... is the Bush or high end WR2 question...
I do apologize for the oversight on my part....what an idiot!
In that case, I think you most definitely go with a WR. RBush at 3.10 was possible to me but he is too much of a gamble and a reach at 3.03 for my liking. The other parts of my post as to why are still applicable though.