Start 3 WR, insanely tough decisions WHIR!!

[HskrPwr13]

Thanks for responding to mine. From an ease of pick stance, I like these 3 best in this order: Colston, Burleson, & Bennett. I actually think the Bears will have to pass to win. Forte may be your week point in that 3-some. My next in line would be DJax. He is a risk, but they do get him involved other ways other than just the deep ball.

Thanks for responding to mine.

[gocards]

Colston, Edwards, Jackson.

[thejusman1]

All these responses have me even more confused. I know I should start Colston for sure... but everybody has chimed in with different options for 2 and 3, haha. I think I will write down Jackson, Bennett, Burleson, and Edwards on individual scraps of paper and go with the 2 names I draw out of a hat. Thanks for the help everyone!

[prophecy135]

My WR situation looks plain awful this week. Which 3 do I play out of this motley bunch?

Marques Colston v PHI - Probably my only "safe" bet, even if it's a touch match-up and Colston could very well put up a dud.

Nate Burleson v SF - Housh being limited might mean more coverage on Burleson. The Lambs cornerbacks are not the same as the 49ers.

Braylon Edwards v Den - You never like it when you hear a Browns beat reporter say "Braylon Edwards has no chemistry with Brady Quinn." Denver shut down the Bengals' passing attack last week against Palmer and crew and played deep cover-two defense which took Chris Henry out of the game. Could Quinn do what Palmer couldn't?

Desean Jackson v NO - Kolb looks more and more likely to start, and PHI says they won't even bring Garcia into the game. In a league that only counts return TDs, not return yards, there's not going to be a lot of ways he's going to be involved without the deep threat.

Earl Bennett v Pitt - Too soon to rely on this guy? Also, Pit aint a joke, and I'm already playing Cutler/Forte. If CHI gets shut down, I don't want three elements of their offense in my lineup.

Chris Henry v GB - Again, relying on a shaky Palmer. And GB did pretty well against the Bears' passing game.

Choose 3 of the 6 and why you would start them. WHIR!!

I like Colston, even though its a tough matchup, NO is gonna throw the ball, and I expect Colston to get more looks this week.
I would then likely go with Bennett, even though you're starting Forte and Cutler, as stated earlier, Cutler is looking for him, and I think there is something about them playing together at Vandy. after that I'm not sure, I dont like D-Jax as Kolb looks shakey. Chris Henry had a disappearing act against Denver, and I think he's loosing looks to Coles and Ocho. That leaves Burleson as your final spot IMO...

viewtopic.php?f=19&t=447613&p=3082715#p3082715

[gocards]

The Bears only scored 15 points against the Packers, they may not hit double digits against the Steelers. Do you really want 3 players from an offense that could get shut out?

[vykeengfan]

colston b/c he plays on an offensive machine.
bennett b/c he'll get a ton of looks and they may be playing catch up.
edwards b/c he has more upside than the rest.
good luck!