Westbrook/Cotchery for T.Edwards/Jennings

[mpt3489]

my wide receivers right now are jennings, ochocinco, lee evans, braylon edwards. my rbs are darren mcfadden, kevin smith, s.jackson, leon washington. my backup qb is matt cassel.

i get:
Brian Westbrook
Jericho Cotchery

I give:
Trent Edwards
Greg Jennings

QB Drew Brees
QB Trent Edwards
WR Greg Jennings
WR Chad Ochocinco
WR Lee Evans
RB Steven Jackson
RB Kevin Smith
TE Greg Olsen
K Nate Kaeding
DEF Washington

[BoyNamedSue]

You def can do w/o Edwards as long as Cassel sures up...or hit the WW. Jennings for Cotchery isn't a total wash but Westbrook could always be huge when healthy. Who are his
IMPO, you're giving up more than you're getting since Westbrook isn't 100%...not that he's played many games in his career at 100% health. If Westbrook is reported to be in better shape than anticipated then go for it.



Help in return?http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=449398

[letsgobirds]

hell i'd do this just on pure value. you have brees at qb, and getting westbrook in a deal like this is a steal if he produces(hope he's healthy for my eagles sake ). i'd accept this.


thanks for mine.

[Bulard280]

Thanks for the help on mine, I would think about doing this since your starting line up after the trade I would say is better than your line up before the trade.

[cantaloupe]

+1 for trade

send em

[saemick]

do it, it betters your team

thanks for the help with mine

[nolzn]

I would keep your players, you're probably better off at RB than WR already, so why trade your stud WR for another back? Skip it.

viewtopic.php?f=18&t=449463&p=3092243#p3092243

[TheMax]

Definitely do it. Edwards isn't really all that valuable and Westy is a first round pick year after year for a reason.

[mpt3489]

bump still fuzzy