With 3 weeks behind us, it's time to start looking at defensive matchups again.
For those who are new to the forum, the formula takes the yards, points, sacks, turnovers (int+fum recoverd) per game for each defense and offense. Then, matches them up with some weighting to get those final rankings. Lower scores mean a more positive matchup for that defense. It does not take bye weeks, homefield advantage, or personnel changes into account.
Team Opponent Score Cincinatti Cleveland -3303 Minnesota Green Bay -1837 Denver Dallas -1756 Chicago Detroit -1585 New Orleans New York Jets -1425 New York Giants Kansas City -1425 San Fran St. Louis -1294 Green Bay Minnesota -1201 Buffalo Miami -1154 San Diego Pittsburgh -1110 Indianapolis Seattle -1025 Jacksonville Tennessee -804 Miami Buffalo -739 Tennessee Jacksonville -722 Detroit Chicago -683 Pittsburgh San Diego -471 Houston Oakland -338 New York Jets New Orleans -262 Oakland Houston -258 St. Louis San Fran -104 Baltimore New England -67 Seattle Indianapolis -67 Cleveland Cincinatti 141 Washington Tampa Bay 234 Tampa Bay Washington 486 New England Baltimore 568 Dallas Denver 1034 Kansas City New York Giants 1990
I know a lot of people are debating between Cinci and SF. The formula heavily favors Cinci in this matchup and I'd tend to agree. St Louis has only give up 5 sacks (and can actually run the ball) to Cleveland's 11. Cinci is tied for the league lead in sacks at 10 while San Fran has 6. Both are decent plays though. I really like New Orleans here as they've been flying a bit under the radar. I think I'd stay away from San Diego, despite the matchup but Indy should be a good play at home against Seattle.
totally agree with the Cinci - Cleveland idea... Cincy is available in my league but I'd have to drop P Harvin to do it... or, I'd have to drop my other defense (Chicago) which I don't really want to do. Oh, what to do!!?
I have a dilemma. The Bears are available, as are the 49ers (they're the top two available). Everywhere else I've looked has the 49ers projected a little higher, but your formula has it the other way around. Both have produced well and have good matchups, but actually, I think the Lions might give the Bears more problems than the Rams give the 49ers.
Which one should I add this week?!?
Thanks!
12 team, H2H, Standard Scoring (Starters in bold) QB: P. Manning, Luck WR: Julio Jones, Welker, Alexander, Hilton, Shorts RB: Rice, Wilson, BJGE, LeShoure TE: Daniels K: Tynes DEF: DET, SD
thanks! with all the variation though, im down between NO, denver, indy, houston, dallas, wash. what would you suggest standard scoring wise? i know you said NO earlier but i wonder if you meant near the top of the pickups type.
schase3367 wrote:totally agree with the Cinci - Cleveland idea... Cincy is available in my league but I'd have to drop P Harvin to do it... or, I'd have to drop my other defense (Chicago) which I don't really want to do. Oh, what to do!!?
I would just stick with Chicago. Although they do have a bye next week. So you'll need to consider that.
curtk wrote:...The Bears are available, as are the 49ers (they're the top two available). Everywhere else I've looked has the 49ers projected a little higher, but your formula has it the other way around. Both have produced well and have good matchups, but actually, I think the Lions might give the Bears more problems than the Rams give the 49ers.
Same advise as above. I'd be more inclined to go with the Bears. Especially considering K. Smith will probably sit this one out.
kickureface wrote:thanks! with all the variation though, im down between NO, denver, indy, houston, dallas, wash. what would you suggest standard scoring wise? i know you said NO earlier but i wonder if you meant near the top of the pickups type.
I would go with either NO or Denver there. NO is probably the safer pick.