Who to pickup Garcon or Burleson-WHIR

[sincitydealz]

Who do u think is a better pickup Garcon from Indy or burleson from Seattle? Both have potential but I need someone who will have an impact in fantasy. Thanks

[rjeffers]

Burleson would be my bet, but not by much. Garcon has the upside in the short term, but have you SEEN Seattle's schedule? Nary a pass defense to be had! My only question for Burleson was whether he'd have chemistry with Seneca. That question was answered this past weekend... As for Garcon, he'll have a lot of games with 1-4 looks, especially when Gonzalez returns. Sometimes he'll make the most of them, sometimes he won't. I'd rather go for the 10-looks guy in Burleson.

Help here, please: http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=450972

[mepaco]

Personally, I like Garcon a little better as a player and think the overall team is much better, but Burleson will be a relatively reliable fantasy producer (lots of targets) and has an easier schedule. Personally, I would go with Burleson.

Any thoughts on mine: viewtopic.php?f=18&t=450747

[oxhammer]

This is a bit trickier with Hasselbeck out. Production will be down a bit. Even so, Burleson and Housh have to be the top two targets. For Garcon, he's the number 3 target behind Wayne and Clark. Once Gonzales is back, Garcon won't get on the field as much and he'll be a #4 when he is. So, over the course of the season, Burleson should be more productive.

viewtopic.php?f=18&t=451006