RB and WR ???? - Fantasy Football Cafe 2013 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Who to Start/Bench

RB and WR ????

Moderator: Football Moderators

RB and WR ????

Postby mtculp » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:30 pm

Need 2 RB's:

C. Portis v, TB
W. McGahee @ NE or
S. Jackson @ SF

Need 3 WR's out of 4:

V. Jackson @ PITT
N. Burleson @ IND
K. Walter v. OAK or
M. Manningham @ KC

1 pt./20 yds.; 6 pts./TD
mtculp
Defensive Assistant
Defensive Assistant


Posts: 473
(Past Year: 57)
Joined: 4 Oct 2008
Yards this season: 116
Home Cafe: Football

Re: RB and WR ????

Postby BriGuy » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:33 pm

McGahee
It's a toss up between Portis and Jackson, but I think I would go with Portis. Watch the injury reports though about Portis' condition.

V.Jackson
Burleson
Walter
DA' BEARS!
BriGuy Beginner
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar

Posts: 736
Joined: 14 Oct 2003
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Football

Re: RB and WR ????

Postby MoDee » Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:36 pm

mtculp wrote:Need 2 RB's:

C. Portis v, TB
W. McGahee @ NE or
S. Jackson @ SF

Need 3 WR's out of 4:

V. Jackson @ PITT
N. Burleson @ IND
K. Walter v. OAK or
M. Manningham @ KC

1 pt./20 yds.; 6 pts./TD

McGahee > Can't sit him anymore!
S. Jax > He's the only talent in STL and will see a ton of carries (30+ touches last week)

Jax > No brainer
Walter > Decent matchup
Manningham > Good matchup

INDY's D is tough on the pass so I would sit Burleson.

Good Luck

Help with mine!: HERE!!!
Image
Thanks to Leber for sick sig!
MoDee
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
Fantasy ExpertCafe RankerWeb Supporter
Posts: 2767
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Yards this season: 0
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Chicago


Return to Who to Start/Bench

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2013 NFL season kicks off in 22:58 hours
(and 107 days)
2013 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact