CRAYTON for COOLEY?? - WHIR!!!

[Moose484848]

My Patrick Crayton for his Chris Cooley

I dont want to go through my whole roster but I need an upgrade at TE and already have pretty good WRs, Crayton is one of my two back ups. I have Boss currently as a starting TE.

[tobias2]

Cooley is more valuable than crayton, IMO. But hard to knwo without seeing rosters. I'm inclined to say take Cooley.

[tfarmer12]

I agree with the post above. Cooley is much more valuable than Crayton.

Help me out:
viewtopic.php?t=451105

[mr. bojangles]

Without seeing your roster, it's hard to say. But unless you have another high quality TE, I would not make this deal. Cooley is a top target for Campbell. Crayton has to share with numerous other receivers, not to mention DAllas is becoming a run focused offense.

[snixx79]

If Crayton is a backup, take Cooley. He's consistent, and he's the top target for Campbell.

[ivelpivel5]

yah if you have cooley as your TE1 do it. no brainer. crayton is a WR3 at best

[MPappadato]

thanks for the help on mine.

Make this deal immediately. Cooley will get more targets and if you aren't starting Crayton anyway then might as well take the upgrade on your starting roster.

[RunnaThaMills]

I dunno why so many are drinking the Cooley coffee - his QB can barely get the ball to him. Both are just about even, but Crayton has much more upside. And CAN get you the BIG PLAY... Cooley will never get down field for a reception ( at most a 10-15 yarder) - I like Crayton much more than Cooley as stand-alone players. If your league counts punt-return yardage, then this is a no-brainer - Crayton is your guy...

HELP- viewtopic.php?f=18&t=451246

[ninremix]

I like cooley a lot more than crayton unless you already have a good TE

Please Help Me ...
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=451250&p=3101187#p3101187

[Lucky7]

cooley >>> crayton, so do it