It would be more fitting to give the award down the road. I find it a little premature and presumptuous to be awarding an individual who shares the same dream of peace many have without any concrete results to point. It's an endorsement for his future actions than a reward for tangible results.
by FearandLoathinginATL » Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:12 pm
I like the guy and support him, but c'mon, he hasnt done anything to warrant the Peace Prize... I mean when you think about past winners like Elie Wiesel, Nelson Mandela, and the Dalai freaking Lama, its just seems like Obamas coming up a little short for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," which basically translates to, "he's better than Bush."