Fellow fantasy football enthusiasts and league commissioners:
A one-for-one trade has been accepted in my league.
Team A, with a record of 1-6, gives up Maurice Jones-Drew (ranked 2nd overall RB in my league).
Team B, with a record of 3-4, gives up Reggie Bush (ranked 36th overall RB in my league).
I am the commissioner, and I have stated my disapproval of this trade publicly due to its obvious lopsidedness along with the fact that Team A (giving up MJD) has barely been participating in the league, regularly starting players on bye weeks and not setting his roster. Additionally, this is an optional buy-in league, and 6 out of the 10 participants have paid entry fees -- Team A and Team B, however, opted not to submit an entry fee, so there is no vested monetary interest.
My concerns are obvious. Unfortunately, my opponent for this week is Team B. The legitimacy of my disapproval is now being questioned by Team B, who suspects that I want to veto this trade simply because I don't want to face MJD this weekend.
I have presented absolute facts and have withheld any opinion or judgment. With the facts, what are your thoughts?