Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions
Moderator: Football Moderators
by JrcWy » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:28 pm
Yahoo standard scoring -NON PPR 12 team league. Playoffs week 15-17.
I start 3 of the following each week...
Welker
Mason
SimsWalker
Lee Evans
Mannigham
Massaquoi
I think this gives me an upgrade for y 3 starters in the playoffs (Fitz, MSW, & Mason). Mannigham is likely my best alternate at the time but Lee Evans seems to have some chemistry with Fitpatrick and Massaquoi has a soft playoff schedue compare to Manningham's tough matchups. Agree or Disagree?
-
JrcWy
- Defensive Assistant


- Posts: 523
- Joined: 1 Sep 2003
- Yards this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Football
by drew1265 » Fri Oct 30, 2009 8:35 pm
i would do this deal welker is consistently good for about 70-100 yards but doesn't find the endzone s much as fitzy will and fitzy is capable of blowing up each week i would sacrifice depth at this point and make the deal
I live for fantasy football!!!!
-
drew1265
- Defensive Assistant

- Posts: 353
- (Past Year: 7)
- Joined: 4 Mar 2005
- Yards this season: 12
- Home Cafe: Football
by tmilless » Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:02 pm
Hmm, I'd probably do it too. Welker is a stud this season too. Thing about manningham is you never know who's going to have the big game in NY. Fitzy is awesome and an every week start. You only have Mario on your bench and wont start him more than a couple times. So basically its LF vs WW on an every week basis and Fitzy is gonna outscore Welker.
So long story longer, make the deal.
-
tmilless
- Water Boy

- Posts: 62
- Joined: 7 Sep 2009
- Yards this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Football
by bostonsoxandy » Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:58 am
JrcWy wrote:Yahoo standard scoring -NON PPR 12 team league. Playoffs week 15-17.
I start 3 of the following each week...
Welker
Mason
SimsWalker
Lee Evans
Mannigham
Massaquoi
I think this gives me an upgrade for y 3 starters in the playoffs (Fitz, MSW, & Mason). Mannigham is likely my best alternate at the time but Lee Evans seems to have some chemistry with Fitpatrick and Massaquoi has a soft playoff schedue compare to Manningham's tough matchups. Agree or Disagree?
I would take the deal although its not a no-brainer.
You could start Fitz, Mason, and SimsWalker now, and when the playoffs come around you can start whoewver has hot hands then. Because you have good depth
-
bostonsoxandy
- Special Teams Staff

- Posts: 266
- (Past Year: 5)
- Joined: 31 Aug 2009
- Yards this season: 7
- Home Cafe: Football
by tmilless » Sat Oct 31, 2009 3:41 pm
I think for the playoffs you want to stick with straight up studs vs looking for hot hands with good depth. Thats my own opinion.
Also, Manningham is losing reps to Hakeem Nicks in NY. I wouldnt want to keep him, then start him based on a good matchup down the stretch when wins are important only to have him get a goose egg cause steve smith or Nicks had the big game.
Dont get me wrong. I like Welker and Manningham. Actually traded FOR welker in one league. But to get Fitzgerald is a risk you probably should take.
Even if you dont make the trade, you've got good WRs
-
tmilless
- Water Boy

- Posts: 62
- Joined: 7 Sep 2009
- Yards this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Football
Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], Jason497 and 3 guests