Trade in my league, do I veto *WHIR*

[chguerin]

So a trade in my league just got sent to me. I have to vote whether to veto or approve them.... Please let me know what you think. It is a ppr league, with a flex spot (RB, WR, TE). All other scoring is pretty standard:

Team One sends:

DeAngelo Williams

Team Two sends:

Ahmad Bradshaw
Kellen Winslow
Eagles Defense


what do you think of it? WHIR

[Hags888]

I think Williams is being over-valued, but it's not horribly lopsided. Bradshaw has put up some good numbers, but is worth maybe half of what Williams is worth. I think sending Winslow and the Eagles is maybe worth 75% of Williams, but at the same time, the team unloading Williams is not going to be able to make up the difference in production with 3 players. I'd let it stand, knowing that one team gave up a little too much for Williams.

Help with mine? viewtopic.php?t=459243

[Hoosierdad]

I don't see that being vetoed. I think Williams is actually worth more than that, but it would depend on his team's needs.

[d68money]

i have DeAngelo and i wouldnt make that trade but unless you can confirm collusion and both guys agree to the trade then i dont think you should veto.

[Dan Lambskin]

agree with the other posters

also...for future reference we have a whole commish forum for these types of questions
NOTE: the general consensous is No Veto Unless Collusion

[Sex Panther]

I agree, can't veto - I personally wouldn't take that trade if I was the Deangelo owner.

[bostonsoxandy]

So a trade in my league just got sent to me. I have to vote whether to veto or approve them.... Please let me know what you think. It is a ppr league, with a flex spot (RB, WR, TE). All other scoring is pretty standard:

Team One sends:

DeAngelo Williams

Team Two sends:

Ahmad Bradshaw
Kellen Winslow
Eagles Defense


what do you think of it? WHIR

DEF. veto. Team 1 is getting raped, trading quality for bad quantity. Defense and TE are pratically worthless and that leave DeAngelo for Ahmad?>?!?!? VETO!!!

help
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=459281

[Achmed]

The DWill side is definitely the better side, but I don't think it's veto-able if the other team needs a TE and is improving his D. Is he an Owens owner, or something?

Not a good deal, but unless there's pretty obvious collusion, I think you let it go.

Return the favor?
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=459259