Garrard may be vs. a weak SF defense, but he has also not been stellar on the road period. Far as flacco vs. pitts, i just cant recommend that, flacco has not shown enough to me, i mean i dropped em after several bad weeks, knew id never use em again, and the pitts game was one that influenced that decision. I would have to go with vince as he has been playing well, and he wants to prove he can keep it up. Plus, he also runs for yardage when need be. If he scampers for even 20yrds thats 2pts, worth half a td in most formats. I mean he ran for like 73 yrds on houston tho his passing totals/td total werent great. Id imagine that game will be a shootout, and arizonas pass defense has not been spectacular, and young will prolly throw more as he gains confidence and its avaialble Plus you got a rb in CJ who can catch and may score a rec td. Garrard doesnt have a lot of options @ wr, if sims-walker doesnt get the ball, no one else really does unless its mjd, lol. So i would go vince there since he is @ home and has some people to throw to in what could be a shootout vs. a pretty good run def.
Far as the rbs, gonna have to follow suit in Benson, Forte, Addai. Not because i think all those matchups are great, but because of their roles and the options. That is as long as benson IS playing, and appears to be the majority of the share holder.