If your in a PPR league that can start 5 WRs, is there anything wrong with drafting both Giants Smith, and Nicks as everyweek starters besides the bye week? Reason im asking is cause they are like a mini Boldin and Fitz
Not sure about the Boldin/Fitz comparison but by being able to start 5 wr's, I dont see anything wrong with them being numbers 3 and 4 for you, 4 and 5 would be really nice. I actually like Nicks more this year, think Smith just had his career year. With the running game being healthier than last year, i dont see Smith getting as many targets. That is until the rb's get banged up again....
i think if brandon jacobs will be back full healthy i see it same as the first reply , they wont get the stats from last year id better look for some other WR's , i mean choose smith or nicks and take some others , idk i just dont like to have 2 WR from the same team cause it will prolly never be that both have nice stats in the same week , i mean they are both solid but not gr8
Im against owning recievers on the same team too Indi, i have nicks as my keeper, and thats why i was wondering for my later rounds smith might be out there with good value
RBwhore wrote:Im against owning recievers on the same team too Indi, i have nicks as my keeper, and thats why i was wondering for my later rounds smith might be out there with good value
I think that's going to be the key. If you can find comparable value, I would shy away from multiple receivers on the same team. If I had Nicks and Smith was the best on the board, come my pick, I'd take him.
RBwhore wrote:Im against owning recievers on the same team too Indi, i have nicks as my keeper, and thats why i was wondering for my later rounds smith might be out there with good value
I guess if he's available and he's clearly the best option of what is on the board, then grab him -- you can always trade one or the other.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by RBManiac » Sat Jun 19, 2010 2:06 am 
