I agree with Thrifty in the 2 year thing for a flex spot. I mean, something as simple as another RB spot, I would of probably opted to keep Donald Brown instead had I known it would of been a chance of starting 3 RB's as soon as next year, and I definately would of kept Deangelo Williams, but the past moves I made were made knowing we only start 2 backs. I think 2 years is a good idea for something like that but that's just me.
i may vote yes on expansion, but not until 2012 probably.
Current Cafe Dynasties: 4th and Goal Fourth & Inches Double D Any Given Dynasty Eat Cheese Dynasty NFL's Finest Cafe Very Special Forces
Not sure how I`d vote on this, need to mull it over some more (seeing as I`m the new kid on thew block!).
Given some of the comments already made, what about expanding the rosters in 2011, and expanding the starting lineup in 2012. Gives people time to adjust.
Fantasy Football: "Luck is where preparation meets opportunity"
stomperrob wrote:Not sure how I`d vote on this, need to mull it over some more (seeing as I`m the new kid on thew block!).
Given some of the comments already made, what about expanding the rosters in 2011, and expanding the starting lineup in 2012. Gives people time to adjust.
stomperrob wrote:Not sure how I`d vote on this, need to mull it over some more (seeing as I`m the new kid on thew block!).
Given some of the comments already made, what about expanding the rosters in 2011, and expanding the starting lineup in 2012. Gives people time to adjust.
I can get behind this.
I don't this is a good time for a "that's what she said" joke.
Seriously, given Thrifty's and LS2's explanation, I think Stomper's idea is the best so far.
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading." - Henny Youngman
I want a prehensile sucker tail, and I don't want to wait fifty million years.
As far as expansion goes yes, Rob's idea is solid. I have to go back to what Instinctive said though and even increasing the lineup in 2012 to a flex or two a 30 man roster should easily be able to cover that. Maybe go to 32 but when I think about it I have never played in a straight dynasty league with relatively small line up req's with more than a 30 man roster. Anything above that has always included IDP. I looked over who was available on the wire and this league knows their football cause really, there wasn't much left. You can also tell from how many FA have been selected so far, not many. I am not sure if it is needed but what do you all think, want to vote on it?
I play in one league that starts 9 and rosters 25. That is too small
Another that starts 9 just went from 25 to 30.
A 3rd is going from 30 to 35 but starts 13 with IDP.
bungle613 wrote:As far as expansion goes yes, Rob's idea is solid. I have to go back to what Instinctive said though and even increasing the lineup in 2012 to a flex or two a 30 man roster should easily be able to cover that. Maybe go to 32 but when I think about it I have never played in a straight dynasty league with relatively small line up req's with more than a 30 man roster. Anything above that has always included IDP. I looked over who was available on the wire and this league knows their football cause really, there wasn't much left. You can also tell from how many FA have been selected so far, not many. I am not sure if it is needed but what do you all think, want to vote on it?
I play in one league that starts 9 and rosters 25. That is too small
Another that starts 9 just went from 25 to 30.
A 3rd is going from 30 to 35 but starts 13 with IDP.
I agree, for such a large roster, starting only 9 seems a little bizarre. Adding at least one flex (RB/WR, or RB/WR/TE) would make sense to me.
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading." - Henny Youngman
I want a prehensile sucker tail, and I don't want to wait fifty million years.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by LS2throwed » Thu Jun 24, 2010 8:51 am 
