RB Issues

[bigmb]

I guess this is an issue I'm happy to have. Here are my RBs

A. Foster (Hou)
B. Jackson (GB)
J. Charles (KC)
A. Peterson (Min)
S. Greene (NYJ)
M. Forte (Chi)
J. Best (Det)

I can start 3. I'm thinking Foster, Jackson, and Charles. The reasoning is the defenses are Wash, Buf, and Cle respectively -- and that seems all kinds of saucy. Peterson is always solid, but Miami shut down Spiller hard. Very hard. Peterson is def better than Spiller, but I think he won't put up the same pointage as the others.

Thoughts?

[grooner10]

what kind of league are you in, your rb's are insane!!!

You can never sit ap ever, even agaisnt miami you didn't pick him 1st or 2nd for him to sit. That being said I say, AP, foster and charles. Maybe jackson agaisnt buffalo but you might want to wait and see how much he is used

[bigmb]

I'm in a keeper league that started last year. I made a lot of decisions that led to me losing last year, but investing in rookies (Wells, Moreno, Greene....etc) and I got 1st overall with A. Peterson. I did a lot of trading, I also have M. Austin and L. Fitz as my two receivers, and this year people were stupid about QBs as I took Brady in the 10th round.

Yeah, it's pretty ballin'

I feel bad about benching AP, but I really can't justify playing him over any of the other three. Matchups are just so...important.