3 for 3 trade...WHIR

[Hubarooski]

League Settings: 12 Team league; Start QB, 1 RB, 3WR, W/R Flex, TE D K; Scoring: 6pts/td 0.5 PPR
WHIR!!!! leave a link

Offer: My Hillis, Forsett and B Tate for his B Jackson, L Murphy and M Thomas

My take, please agree or disagree: First off, Its an even deal.
I will likely be dropping Forsett of Jackson tomorrow for a WW QB to start for Cutler.
I don't like giving up the best player in the deal (IMO thats Hillis).
Tate is a tough call because its speculation that he will perform well in replacement of Moss. I am optimistic, but looking for others opinions. I could sell high on potential or he could become a steal off the WW. If V Jackson gets traded to the pats, Tate is likely not worth much
Murphy and Thomas would not crack my starting lineup if WR corps remains healthy
If Andre Johnson doesn't play this week, I don't have a WR to fill in this week with Marshall and Tate on Bye.


My Team:
Qb Cutler
Rb Turner, Hillis, Torain, Lynch, Barber, Forsett
WR A Johnson, Marshall, Nicks, S Moss, B Tate
TE Gates

His Team
Qb Rodgers
Rb Addai, Betts, B Jackson, Darby
Wr Boldin, L Moore, M Wallace, L Murphy, M Thomas, H Douglas
TE Finley

[Hoosierdad]

Is the only reason you are doing this is to get a WR bye week fill in? If so, what WRs are on your wire? Because I don't like that trade for you at all. I would rather take a flier on somoene for 1 week than do that deal. I don't see how it helps you other than this week.

help?
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=479496

[woods_opc]

I agree with Hoosier. If you are giving up Hillis you should get much better value than that. Either advertise to your league that you are willing to apart with P Hill or use the WW for a one week fill.

But don't do this deal

help?
viewtopic.php?t=479498

[Hubarooski]

Its a Bye week fill/sell high on Tate before he plays a game.

[woods_opc]

I'm fine with selling high on Tate. Your you could get Murphy for Tate based on upside I would do this deal, I still don't think it is worth Hillis however. If you have the depth at runningback to give up Hillis I think you can aim higher. Look at the Jennings, Nicks, D Jack, Welker, etc. owners. They may need backs and may take Hillis straight up.

help?
viewtopic.php?t=479498

[P1Army]

thanks for the help on mine.
Jackson is almost bustworthy, the packers don't have much faith in him, he's just no tthat talented. The potential upside with Tate is too tasty to trade away just yet. The V Jax deal has been shot down by most experts so I'm not to worried about that and by no means should you be parting ways with Hillis, he's playing out of his mind right now and is worth more than what is being offed. I say hold onto what you got.

[abercrombie9701]

No way you should mke this trade. Jackson has showednothing since week one. And Thomas and Murphy are sub par players.



My link
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=479569