M.Vick for Sanchez and welker?!? This a fair deal?WHIR

[aldavis]

It makes it tough to answer the question without knowing exactly what your roster looks like. This looks like a good deal unless you're really short at QB or really deep at WR. If Welker starts most weeks and you can play matchups at QB2 it's a good deal. If all you have is Rodgers, Vick, a marginal QB2 plus massive talent at WR you might want to stay where you are.

To answer your question: maybe it's a good trade, maybe it's not.

Don't expect Sanchez to put up Vick-like #'s. He protects the ball and keeps the offense moving and sometimes he'll have a really good week.

Welker is the key, if he plays it's a good deal if he's riding the bench it's not.

[matt21484]

I'd have to agree with Aldavis. It's hard to tell without knowing what your current QB/WR situation looks like. That being said, I like Vick as a QB over Sanchez, he's more mobile and a bigger threat with the deep ball. IMO, due to his injury it makes him a little less desirable though. If you're stacked in one direction or the other, that will answer your question, but we don't know...

[SD2k10]

alot of my leagues are similar so i moved my sig so no one is confused! thanks guys

Qb-rodgers
QB-orton
RB-torain
RB-spiller
WR-austin
WR-floyd
WR-lloyd
TE-Gates
WR/TE-D.Clark
WR/RB-addai

BEnch-VIck,crabtree,collie,M.Barber, B.Edwards,tolbert

feel free to comment on my starter vs who i benched....collie is a game time decision... thanks for all the input guys dont forget to leave yours!!

[aldavis]

You're good at QB, fine at wideout, and thin at RB. I'd shop for a RB.