TD Heavy scoring 6-12pt TD (depends on length) 12-24pt reception TD 2pt for every 50yds
Need 2 Foster vs KC (19th against the run) Ray Rice @ NE (23rd) Peterson vs Dal (3rd)
All three are must starts,... especially now that Ray Rice is getting the red zone and goal line carries. I definitely regretted not starting Foster week one,.... but didn't start Rice Sunday. So,..... I haven't been making very good choices. Leaning towards Foster and Rice.
So,... I'm ready for it,.... INPUT, INPUT, INPUT!!!
Last edited by djhn9 on Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
TD 6-12 varies on length, Any reverse role TD is DOUBLE PTS
AP might be the best player in the league, but I don't like this particular matchup. I have an odd feeling that Dallas is going to be rush heavy and eat up some clock because of their misfortunes when throwing the ball 50 times.
wow, that's a stacked backfield. I have Foster and Rice myself and luckily plugged Foster in week one at the last minute but have had Rice on the bench the past 2 weeks in favor of Foster but that killed me last week. Rice is going back to his "must-start" role on my team and I'm thinking of benching Foster this week for J. Charles. See my other topic below. That being said, I don't have AP and I don't know how you ever really sit him.... I'd go Rice and AP. Thnx for help on mine. I have another if you have the time: viewtopic.php?f=19&t=480637
Normally I'd say different but this time I would BENCH FOSTER. Why? He is s bit banged up and they were talking about resting him through the bye week next week already. I do not trust Kubiak as far as I can throw him. Safest bet is Rice and Peterson and you can take that to the bank. They are great options and I could be wrong but why chance it? That is how I see it.
you never bench peterson... and start rice at the pats, im a pats fan and their defense sucks! they only win games if there offense can put up over 35 points a week because there defense cant stop anyone.. look at what rice did in playoffs last year against pats..