Arizona Cardinals 98.11 Chicago Bears 82.70 Cleveland Browns 78.92 Dallas Cowboys 73.24 Baltimore Ravens 70.54 San Diego Chargers 70.00 Buffalo Bills 68.65 Philadelphia Eagles 68.38 Carolina Panthers 68.11 Pittsburgh Steelers 67.30 Atlanta Falcons 66.22 Oakland Raiders 65.68 Minnesota Vikings 65.41 Cincinnati Bengals 64.32 New England Patriots 64.05 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 64.05 Tennessee Titans 62.97 Miami Dolphins 62.16 Kansas City Chiefs 62.16 New York Jets 61.89 San Francisco 49ers 60.81 Washington Redskins 60.54 Indianapolis Colts 59.73 Detroit Lions 58.65 Green Bay Packers 55.95 New York Giants 55.95 New Orleans Saints 55.14 Seattle Seahawks 55.14 Jacksonville Jaguars 52.70 Denver Broncos 51.08 St. Louis Rams 48.65 Houston Texans 43.24
A NOTE about Normalization:Normalized projections are derived by taking the highest possible scoring defensive matchup (best DST matchup between two teams) and the lowest possible scoring defensive matchup, creating a scale of 0-100 and assigning value to each matchup score to give an overall rating so you can make relevance decisions instead of simply trading up to get higher on the chart.
I'd like to briefly point out that these numbers are based on previous weeks and does not take into account injuries or personnel swaps. In particular I see a mild "issue" with Arizona and John Skelton. This shouldn't be taken as a "do not use" but rather "caution" as I believe last week's performance against Denver was more about Denver's coaching change and lack of offensive production than I do anything else. Feel free to discuss. I would just be nervous starting them, although I've said that throughout the season and they've performed nicely. The normalization also has the highest rating we've seen to date for a matchup so maybe I just despise the Cards.
Car and Ari are both run-heavy, I see this as a low-scoring "safe" match-up. I'm plugging in Arizona in a league.
Patriots are way too low, especially if Rodgers doesn't play. Either way, Green Bay is highly one-dimensional, which is the kind of team that Belichick feasts on. With the Pats offense rolling, I see them forcing Green Bay into pass-mode, which will create sack and interception opportunities for their D. Pats are my waiver wire grab of the week.
u_fig_eater wrote:Car and Ari are both run-heavy, I see this as a low-scoring "safe" match-up. I'm plugging in Arizona in a league.
Patriots are way too low, especially if Rodgers doesn't play. Either way, Green Bay is highly one-dimensional, which is the kind of team that Belichick feasts on. With the Pats offense rolling, I see them forcing Green Bay into pass-mode, which will create sack and interception opportunities for their D. Pats are my waiver wire grab of the week.
I couldn't agree more in regards to the Patriots. Even if Rodgers were going to go I have to think they are a great play. If Rodgers can't go this could be the difference maker in the fantasy playoffs for some teams.
They looked absolutely terrible up until last week; in fact, I almost thought they had quit. Then they beat up on Denver last week, but I'm not sure what to think about that either since Denver is terrible as well. Carolina is bad, but I get the feeling more that it's just a complete lack of anything at the QB position.
I was actually planning to roll with Dallas, but after seeing Arizona actually sort of show up last week I'm unsure. Of course, it's not like the Redskins have anything that's incredibly great or scary, plus McNabb is relatively immobile at this point in his career.
And Cleveland looks like a good play, almost anyone playing the Bengals is at this point with the number of picks that Palmer throws....
buffalobillsrul2002 wrote:I'm not sure what to think about Arizona.
They looked absolutely terrible up until last week; in fact, I almost thought they had quit. Then they beat up on Denver last week, but I'm not sure what to think about that either since Denver is terrible as well. Carolina is bad, but I get the feeling more that it's just a complete lack of anything at the QB position.
That's why I think AZ is a good play, not cause they are anything special but simply because Car is so bad offensively. I mean, worthlessness at QB can make any defense look awesome, just look at Houston against Ten with Rusty Smith or SD against KC with Croyle instead of Cassel.
Azrael
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 8275
(Past Year: 20)
Joined: 29 Jun 2003
Yards this season: 24
Home Cafe: Football
Location: Keeping da cafe sucka free for 9 years straight
I have got to decide between Arizona and Cleveland, and they're both at the top here. That rating for Zona sure does look tasty, don't think I've ever seen one that high before.
But Palmer sure does suck.
Fourth and Inches (Dynasty) Zealots: 4, 39, 56 Cafe Very Special Forces (Dynasty) General Manager Wannabees Frozen Tundra (Dynasty)
u_fig_eater wrote:Car and Ari are both run-heavy, I see this as a low-scoring "safe" match-up. I'm plugging in Arizona in a league.
Patriots are way too low, especially if Rodgers doesn't play. Either way, Green Bay is highly one-dimensional, which is the kind of team that Belichick feasts on. With the Pats offense rolling, I see them forcing Green Bay into pass-mode, which will create sack and interception opportunities for their D. Pats are my waiver wire grab of the week.
ne should be the #1 defense if flynn is in there, gb's o-line is horrible, rodgers legs save them so many times. expect at the very least 6 sacks, great chance of more if flynn is the qb.
i'm going with san diego in a few of my leagues, of the defenses avaliable on the wire, i'd go with dallas against wash as my 2nd choice, and carolina as my 3rd choice.....i'd go with ne over all these, if flynn is the qb.
carolina is the defense you wanta own in that zona game, carolina is gonna run it down zonas throat all day, stewart has gone over 100 in every game in his carrer when he has got more than 15 touchs, he should get close to 30 in this game, zona will be coming from behind with skelton at qb in my opinion, should equal points.
if asanti samuals plays, philly may also be a great play, cus samuals will shut down nicks, and manning has few other options.
I only live by 3 rules: Eat Twat, Smoke Pot, and Smile Alot