Mike Wallace for Fred Jackson, too much? (WHIR)

[Ozymandias19]

I would be giving Wallace for Jackson, and I would be making the offer, I just want a fourth RB to fill in on bye's and he would be a good one. I'm only willing to trade away WR's, i'm just not sure which to trade for him.

My WR's are Megatron/Harvin/Colston/Wallace/Mike-sims Walker

Megatron is the obvious no. I also think Colston and Harvin are a bit much. MSW was picked up off the waivers, I doubt that went unnoticed, that leaves Wallace. What do ya'll think?

[ICanGoAllTheWay]

If you can, give up MSW. Mike Wallace has already been pretty good this year with a 4th string QB throwing to him, now imagine how much better he will be with Big Ben throwing to him. MSW has the potential to play good, but he will be inconsistent due to the fact that he has a really inconsistent QB throwing to him. As for Fred Jackson, I think he is a decent RB to have in case you need to fill him in on other players Bye weeks. Don't give up a good WR like Wallace just to get RB depth to fill in for a week or two. If the guy who has Jackson needs WR depth, i'm sure he'd do MSW for Jackson.

Help me with mine:
http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=480743

[drew1265]

I don't mind the deal, I think wallace certainly improves with Big Ben back, but he is a boom or bust players similar to MSW and I like Jackson as 4th RB flex type goign forward i think he gets 15-18 touches a game, if you really want the depth i don't think it's a bad deal

helpe me viewtopic.php?f=18&t=480772