Enough for H. Nicks? WHIR

[AsianChexMix]

I was looking to see if this would be enough for me to snag H. Nicks. We start 2 WR, 2 RB and a flex (WR/RB) and have 1 PPR

Trade is M. Lewis (TE) + G. Jennings (WR) for H. Nicks (WR)

My Team
WR: Austin, AJ, Jennings, D. Bess
TE: M. Lewis, J. Tamme

Her Team
WR: Nicks, Maclin, M. Williams (SEA), Moore
TE: Heap, Carlson

I was thinking that it'd be a huge upgrade for me in WR but also it helps her with TE depth. I would like to keep Tamme as he is filling in nicely as D. Clark replacement. What do you guys think? Too little for Nicks? Would Tamme be more likely?

Leave a link and I'll help you guys out. Thanks!

[Ozymandias19]

No. That more than likely wouldn't be enough.

[tmacuf]

yeah, not enough, jennings is down, and lewis perceived value is not any higher than heaps even though it should be. need a rb in that deal with jennings
HELP ME
viewtopic.php?t=484527

[sheethappens]

Unless you are talking about one of the top 5 TE's in the game, TE's are basically worthless in trades. Unless you are taking about one of the top 5 TE's then they are way too inconsistant in their scoring and from one week to the next any of about 25 could have a great game and then disappear for 3 or 4 games. Your trade is bascally Jennings for Nicks, would YOU accept that offer for Nicks if you were his owner???

[robito24]

Yeah might not be enough for Nicks. If you offered Tamme it might be a different story as his value seems to be pretty high right now and I perceive it dropping a bit once teams start covering him with a DB instead of a linebacker.

viewtopic.php?t=484563

[prophecy135]

I dont think even with Tamme in there it'd be enough.. Like someone said earlier, unless its bascially Gates, you shouldnt try to throw a TE in a trade as they're so abundant.