strife22 wrote:I disagree with Knox having a similar downside to Wallace, Knox is always reliable to put up solid numbers
Knox has had 5 pts or less in 4 of his last 8.
Wallace has had 11 or more in 5 of his last 7.
Actually, you are right but for the wrong reason. I take it back. Wallace is far more reliable.
Last edited by Rob035 on Sat Dec 04, 2010 9:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.