by moochman » Sat May 21, 2011 9:15 pm
My Gosh, I had no idea what a boob Goodell is. He seldom understood questions, nor did he give answers. Love the transparency answer. "We told the union and the public what we wanted, we are going to give a slight increase this year and 14% over the next whatever years, and have increased retirement bennys 63%". Yeah, Rodger dodger, problem isn't that players will make more than they are, but that they will make less of the overall cut. And the retirement issues you should, out of deep shame, never mention. 63%....from 1993 benefits!!!!!!!!!!! Heck, I dont even know if any of the franchises were worth over $100 mil then. Shame on you, you bleeping rat. ex-players live in poverty and you use that to show how much you care, 63% more than crap.
Very, very disappointing Q & A Rodger. Loved the implied "we want to get back to the bargaining table"-implication that the union is holding things up, then when pressed on why the three week delay in barainging you say that the meetings are scheduled by the courts. Sorry, I am more disappointed in the inability of Goodell to understand questions than I am his elusive answers. Hey Rog, when they asked why you didn't have Ford Jr involved they meant that your disrespected his history of collective bargaining. You made the disrespect more evident when you said that there are members from several teams doing what Ford Jr, apparently, was unqualified to do.
Sir, you are purposely vague or ignorantly clueless. Even the simplest of answers, like "I have no ruling in individual plays" regarding the Suh fine and blown Megatron catch led to you meandering down a path of vague defensiveness. The only thing you made me believe was that somehow think more obscure rules add clarity. That somehow adding enough legalese to a rule will somehow make fans stop believing their own eyes.
Well, must be working because your Q&A already has me not believing my ears.
I think, therefore I am. I think fantasy, therefore I am unreal?