Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions
Moderator: Football Moderators
by LSUby50 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:47 am
i think he could still put up 8 TDs on a bad team if/when healthy. (still much better than Plaxico imo)
I heard this morning on the radio that teams are financially better off not signing veteran players until after week 1. (cant remember the reasoning, but they mentioned several vets that will probably get signed week 1.)
Is T.O. worth stashing on the bench? maybe as a WR5 or 6?
Is he even available in yahoo leagues?
-
LSUby50
- Defensive Assistant

- Posts: 392
- (Past Year: 86)
- Joined: 31 Aug 2009
- Yards this season: 198
- Home Cafe: Football
by Bronco_7 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:07 am
Forget wasting a pick on a guy who is not even signed.
Please see mine
viewtopic.php?t=491955

Sig GoodStash
12 team
QBs Roethlisberger, Kapernik
RBs Doug Martin, D Thomas, Bryce Brown
WRs C Johnson, Demaryius Thomas, Garcon
TE Gates
K Vinatiari
DST Jets, Cards
-
Bronco_7
- General Manager


- Posts: 2426
- (Past Year: 75)
- Joined: 11 Sep 2005
- Yards this season: 98
- Home Cafe: Football
by dblj9911 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 10:27 am
If you have a really deep league and can get him and stash him then fine, but I'd keep an eye on him and see where he signs, but it will most likely be after week 1.
The reason behind it is in the NFL for vested verterans there salary is gauranteed if they are on a roster as of week one. If they sign after that the contract is not guaranteed, so a team could sign him, he he act's like he normally does or isn't playing well he can be cut and he won't be paid the rest of his money.
viewtopic.php?t=491887
-
dblj9911
- General Manager

- Posts: 4263
- (Past Year: 249)
- Joined: 2 Nov 2004
- Yards this season: 574
- Home Cafe: Football
- Location: Rochester
Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Jason497 and 3 guests