Ben Tate, ?? over Gore or Starks

[Green and Gold]

Anyone think Ben Tate is a better play over Franky Gore on the hapless niners, (without special teams they had like -2 points that week) Starks is the new STUD in Green Bay forget it, just put that in the subject line.
Tate or Gore ?? Any thoughts? Even if Foster is back , Tate might be better but will he get the carries??
I cant have another Gore BUST week.
Thanks , and good luck to you and yours

[Ipm4325]

Man, I just don't think Tate will get the carries to justify you starting him over Gore. Foster will be back and get back in rhythm... I have Tate too, so this sucks. I would love it if Foster went down again. I think you have to go with Gore, i dont think there's any way that he repeats that kind of piss poor performance.

[Fasteddy]

All things considered, there is no way I'd play Tate before Starks 1st and Gore 2.... It's all about the matchups!

Please help me in return at:
viewtopic.php?t=496856

[WickedSmaat]

I'd have a hard time justifying starting a backup RB over a starting one. I love the HOU offense, but without Tate getting the rock a ton it's a huge risk. Gore can at least catch the ball somewhat to offset some tunnel vision. I'd roll with Gore over Tate.

[Invictus7]

Well, do you want to know if he's the better player, or should you start him? Lol

He'd have to do alot with his 10 carries to match what Gore will do with 25. Who knows though, maybe Foster will slip in the shower.