Mendenhall & Manningham for Nicks

[redbirded]

Non ppr, 14 team. The team I am trading to has lost Charles. I give up Mendy and Manningham and get Nicks.
I'm major weak at WR:
Manningham
Bess
Branch
Amendola
Crabtree
I'm hearing Crabtree is going to play this week but who knows what he'll do even if he does.
I'm solid at RB with Fred Jackson, Blount, and Tate.
WHIR!!! Leave a link

[latsprewell20002000]

Its alot to give up. However you are certainly hurting at WR. Nicks does make your team better. I say yes.

[rbem84]

I would do this. Nicks is a good upgrade at a bad position for you and you can live without Mendenhall given that you've got Jackson, Tate, and Blount.

Any thoughts on mine? http://www.fantasyfootballcafe.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=498215

[redbirded]

I offered up Blount as well but he went Mendy. Should I push for Blount???

[rbem84]

I offered up Blount as well but he went Mendy. Should I push for Blount???

I would do the trade even with Mendenhall but, if it's not going to hurt you to push Blount again, then I would push Blount again. I'd rather have Mendenhall on my roster than Blount.

[PrinceEatMeat]

Yeah, you should probably do it to get Nicks. He would be a great add for you.

Help with mine please!

viewtopic.php?f=18&t=498289

[redbirded]

OK, pulled the trigger, thanks everyone. I'll try and get back on yours

[MadDog36]

I think you seriously overpaid. I would want a RB in return as well if I'm dealing Mendy.

Mendy to me is worth a combo of like Blount and maybe IDK Steve Smith. You should have received a RB back in the deal. Worst case a handcuff or low end #2 starter someone like Benson.

[itsme2]

I agree that you should have got some rb in return..I think you gave up too much.

your thoughts
viewtopic.php?t=498515