GeneralTsou wrote:they are pretty much conspiring against me because they are afraid of my lineup
and because I pulled off a trade where I got CJ2K for Jahvid Best and Manningham. They tried to veto that too
CJ2K for Best and Manningham shouldn't be veto, because Best is doing good while CJ2K show's poor production from week1-week2, plus you also got WR2 from NYG, which sometime is good for WR3 spot or flex in your team.
like my previous post, if they are veto this because of the fairness and to protect new managers, explain to them.
but if they doing this just to screw you up, then it's just not a very fun league to stay.
i would find a league with trustworthy commissioner.
honestly, your team after trade is good, but i won't say it's that scary they need to screw you up with veto power.
RB CJ2K, Mendy
WR Jenning, Britt
at least your QB is still weak and your flex is injury-prone, and your RB1 didn't really show much production this season
i've seem better team in 10-12 teams league, and your team really shouldn't require veto to balance the league.
what you can do is try split the trade into 2-3 small trade
1. send D.Nelson/Ingram or D.Nelson/Ingram for Jenning
2. then send second trade with CJ for Mendy/Boldin
or you can replace Ingram with D.Moore and argue he is probably one of the best rookie WR and you are using 2 rising WR to trade for Jenning, which is very fair
then CJ for Mendy/Boldin just looks right.
i see a lot way to go around this trade if Mendy owner is willing to work with you
my guess is other team think it's not balance because it's basically benefit of 2-3 trade stacked into one trade. but in some league, if you check rank1-3 team's trading history and combine them into 1 big trade, that's probably what you would see similar to this trade.