Beanie Wells or James Starks @ Flex? WHIR!

[farrell_i]

Who should I start? An injured Beanie against a stout Seattle D @ home or James Starks against the Bears?

Non-PPR. 2 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 WR/RB, 2 TE, 1 D, 1 K
Starters:
QB: Aaron Rogers, Michael Vick, Ryan Fitzpatrick
RB: Felix Jones, Matt Forte, Beanie Wells, James Starks, Ben Tate
WR: Mike Wallace, Mario Manningham, Nate Burleson, AJ Green, Eric Decker
TE: Dallas Clark, Jimmy Graham
D: Jets
K: Jason Hanson

[Tony Micelli]

Starks for sure. He's already established himself as the top back to own in their backfield. The Bears have also been giving up a lot of rushing yards the first 2 weeks. And Beanie may not even play.

Help me out man?
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=499335

[prophecy135]

I'm not sure I'd call Seatle's Run D stout..

that being said, I agree, you play starks, he's healthy. I think Chicago is a bit tougher run D but Starks is healthy and Beanie is banged up.

help with mine?
viewtopic.php?t=499332

[jm968859]

Beanie

[WickedSmaat]

I'd go Beanie, he's ranked second in Football Outsiders DYAR (first in DVOA), the Cards o-line is ranked 1st, and I can't imagine that Seattle's abysmal offense will be making this game any sort of contest.

[jblaze102]

Starks. Beanie is a game-time decision. He hurt his hamstring in practice. Even if he does play there is risk. Starks for sure

[ATLbraves]

Starks is the safer play

Beanie has the most upside


I'm leaning towards Starks since hamstring injuries are never good for a RB.

[Go DRays!!!]

If not for the injury I might have said Beanie. But with the "game-time decision" status, I would play Starks.




any help would be appreciated
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=499348&p=3357553#p3357553