Newton or Rodgers

[sparky5]

Im thinking Newton

[Go DRays!!!]

There....is....no....way....I....could....sit....Rodgers!!!



any help would be appreciated
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=499348&p=3357553#p3357553

[cloudwasher]

Drew Brees lit up the Bears secondary last week, so don't have too many reservations about Rodgers based on matchup. Go with the proven stud QB over the emerging one, go with Rodgers. Newton is going to be great, but he's still a rookie and likely to have a few hiccup games along the way, and its anyone's guess which games those will be.

[numb9number]

You cannot sit Rodgers, period !

viewtopic.php?t=499352

[sparky5]

Rodgers against Bears
Year Score Yds TD Int
2008 (GB) 37-3 227 2 1
2008 (C) 17-20 260 2 1
2009 (GB) 21-15 184 1 0
2009 (C) 21-14 180 1 0
2010 (C) 17-20 316 2* 1
2010 (GB) 10-3 229 1 1
2010 (C) 21-14 244 1* 2
* — includes rushing touchdown

this one is in chicago

[jblaze102]

If I had Rodgers and Newton I would be trading Newton while his value is high. With that being said... Rodgers.

[latsprewell20002000]

Yeah I would probably end up starting Rodgers too. Trade Newton!!!

[sparky5]

so noone likes Newton over Rodgers?,,,

maybe I am crazy the Bears did shut down the Falcons and the Saints kinda got lucky on a long TD pass.

car is at home vs Jax a lesser opponet

[latsprewell20002000]

I like Newton. Its just hard to pick him over Rodgers after only two games from Newton.

[jblaze102]

so noone likes Newton over Rodgers?,,,

maybe I am crazy the Bears did shut down the Falcons and the Saints kinda got lucky on a long TD pass.

car is at home vs Jax a lesser opponet

I don't think its that we don't like Newton. That's not it. It's just that too many times we overthink it instead of playing our studs and end up getting burned for it. If you wanna put your balls out there with a rookie QB instead of the Superbowl MVP go for it.