standard yahoo rule, non-ppr, starting 1QB 2RB 3WR 1TE 1Def 1K
that's me
team1
QB Vick/Fitspatrick
WR White/Wallace/N.Washington/V.Cruz/J.Knox/D.Henderson
RB Foster/MJD/Hillis/M.Bush
TE Gron
team2
QB Newton/Kolb
WR Welker/S.Smith/Austin/Ocho/B.Lloyd
RB BJGE/J.Stewart/F.Jones/R.Grant
TE O.Daniels
current trade is MJD/Knox for Austin/Grant
before week2 (before Foster comes back healthy), we had trade Newton/BJGE for Hillis/E.Manning, team1 need RB2 before Foster comes back, and team2 need a QB
now there's another trade, team1 want get a decent WR3, as you can see team1 got bunch decent WW WR knox, washington, cruz but non of them give enough production yet and with Foster back to 100%, having Hillis sitting on bench is a waste.
tried to proposed Hillis for Austin and got countered to current offer.
the only thing is if team1 take this offer, it's will be like
MJD/Newton/Knox/BJGE for Hillis/Austin/E.Manning/Grant (if we combine all trading history together)
but right now, the current trade is MJD/Knox for Austin/Grant
what's your opinion?

Cafe Home
Fantasy Baseball
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey













