McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR= - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions

McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Moderator: Football Moderators

McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby thepsychic » Fri Oct 07, 2011 11:40 am

Is this a fair trade in a non-ppr standard scoring league?

L.McCoy

for

F.Jackson + P.Hillis

(on a side note, are you higher on Hillis or Best?)
thepsychic
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 250
Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Home Cafe: Basketball

Re: McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby taw856 » Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:54 pm

Yes that's fair. (Though I'd prefer the McCoy side unless I really needed the RB depth. Also FJax is a sell-high guy right now.)

It's a toss up, but in a non-PPR, I'd probably go Hillis over Best.
BOLD PICKS FOR 2013
A. Rodgers outscores D. Brees in ESPN standard scoring by 40+.
D. McFadden plays 16 games (but ineffectively for someone whose only problem we always assumed was health).
M. Lynch=not a Top 10 RB.
V. Cruz=Top 7 WR.
G. Tate=Top 36 WR.
taw856
Head Coach
Head Coach

User avatar

Posts: 1326
(Past Year: 198)
Joined: 16 Jul 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Re: McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby McDuff » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:09 pm

In non-PPR that is very fair.

I think most of us McCoy owners love him tho and never want to give him up but that is tempting.
Clearly if they both stayed healthy and at current (or better for Hillis) production it is a great deal.

but how many times has that happened?
Answer - None.
Answer to your question - Yes fair and acceptable offer if one owner needs depth and the other has depth already
McDuff
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 204
Joined: 21 Aug 2011
Home Cafe: Football

Re: McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby bricox171 » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:17 pm

I say this is a fair trade for both parties...

McCoy is a PPR stud but the best thing about him is regardless whats going on with the offense, he is going to get hit touches and put up solid numbers...

FJax and Hillis will make a great 1..2 punch but are more suited as RB2 in more shallow leagues.
bricox171
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 197
Joined: 22 Sep 2011
Home Cafe: Football

Re: McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby cjdarling19 » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:04 pm

I agree with everyone else, it's definitely a fair trade. That being said, I still wouldn't trade McCoy. Neither Hillis nor Best have been very consistent thus far, and unless you really needed a RB#2, I wouldn't take either of them.

Please help me out when you have a chance - viewtopic.php?t=502235
cjdarling19
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 85
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Home Cafe: Football

Re: McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby mzkp54 » Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:13 pm

I agree, its a fair trade, but I'd rather have McCoy.

Lend a hand?
viewtopic.php?f=18&t=502346
mzkp54
Head Coach
Head Coach

User avatar
CafeholicMock(ing) DrafterCafe Blackjack Weekly Winner
Posts: 1539
(Past Year: 235)
Joined: 21 Mar 2011
Home Cafe: Football

Re: McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby JP555 » Sat Oct 08, 2011 11:17 am

I think its fair and you'd be buying Hillis somewhat low. But I think it really depends on what your squad looks like
JP555
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff


Posts: 182
Joined: 1 Oct 2011
Home Cafe: Football

Re: McCoy for Fred Jackson + Hillis =WHIR=

Postby djadrock » Sat Oct 08, 2011 12:04 pm

If you need RBs then it is a great deal. If you are solid I would keep McCoy. So, the trade really depends on your team dynamics.

Help: viewtopic.php?f=18&t=502471
djadrock
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar

Posts: 982
(Past Year: 7)
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Home Cafe: Football


Return to Draft, Trade, & Waiver Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 6:04 hours
(and 41 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact