6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100% - Fantasy Football Cafe 2014 Fantasy Football Cafe


Return to Roster Ratings

6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Moderator: Football Moderators

6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby pommona22 » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:19 pm

Standard 10 teamer
QB: Romo
RB1: Foster
RB2: Gore
Rb3: Wells
WR1: Fitzgerald
WR2: B marsh
TE: Graham
D: Steelers/49ers
K: Janikowski

Bench: Aj Green, Hightower, Helu, Tate, Hunter

What do you guys think win championship?? Its a pretty big money league main concerns are how do i stack up vs these 2 teams:

QB: Stafford
Rb1: Rice
Rb2: Mccoy
Rb3:Bradshaw
Wr1: Nicks
Wr2: St Johns
Te: Keller
D: Lions
K: Cundiff

Bench: Blount, Battle, Freeman, LLoyd, Crabtree

Qb: Fitzpatrick
Rb1: AP
Rb2: DMC
Rb3: St. Jackson
Wr1:Bowe
Wr2: Boldin
TE: Finley
D: Ravens
K Bailey

Bench: Best, flooyd, plaxico, olsen, hasselbeck, DHB

Would love feedback and remember WHIR 100%
Last edited by pommona22 on Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pommona22
Special Teams Staff
Special Teams Staff

User avatar

Posts: 232
Joined: 21 Oct 2010
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby aerathi » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:25 pm

I vote luckbox. The team I fear most there is the second out of the three. That team is stacked.

Not that your team is bad, I definitely see all three of those teams being top 3. I vote middle team, your team, then the third team in order of best to worst.
aerathi
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 53
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby aerathi » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:31 pm

Oh and if you can help me here, I'd appreciate it :D

I really want some other viewpoints on this.

viewtopic.php?t=504699
aerathi
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 53
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby Weasel_King » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:39 pm

Not to be a downer but I actually think that I would prefer to have the other teams that you listed as opposed to yours. You still have a very nice team, but it's gonna be a fight for you to win the championship (although your 6-0 record helps for seeding so that you don't have to face either team in the first round meaning you only have to beat one of them to win).
Weasel_King
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar
Pick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 688
(Past Year: 18)
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby aerathi » Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:53 pm

Weasel_King wrote:Not to be a downer but I actually think that I would prefer to have the other teams that you listed as opposed to yours. You still have a very nice team, but it's gonna be a fight for you to win the championship (although your 6-0 record helps for seeding so that you don't have to face either team in the first round meaning you only have to beat one of them to win).


Out of curiousity, how would you rate those three teams?

I looked at the teams a few times and I think original poster's team and the third team listed (in a matchup) I think is a coin flip at worst.

I'm just curious why you think the third one has an advantage.

Also, it's very hard to make text sound impartial. Don't think I'm saying your wrong.
aerathi
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 53
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby Weasel_King » Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:19 am

aerathi wrote:
Weasel_King wrote:Not to be a downer but I actually think that I would prefer to have the other teams that you listed as opposed to yours. You still have a very nice team, but it's gonna be a fight for you to win the championship (although your 6-0 record helps for seeding so that you don't have to face either team in the first round meaning you only have to beat one of them to win).


Out of curiousity, how would you rate those three teams?

I looked at the teams a few times and I think original poster's team and the third team listed (in a matchup) I think is a coin flip at worst.

I'm just curious why you think the third one has an advantage.

Also, it's very hard to make text sound impartial. Don't think I'm saying your wrong.

No offense taken! We can have different opinions on which team is better, doesn't mean one of us is wrong or right. For sure, all 3 of the teams are good for being in a 10-team league. Here's how I would break down the original poster's team with team 3

QB: Romo vs Fitzpatrick -Original poster has the advantage, although honestly I don't think it is by that much
RB1:Foster vs AP- I would rate AP over Foster, not by too much though
RB2:Gore vs DMC- I think team 3 has a huge advantage here
RB3: Wells vs Jackson- Think team 3 has the advantage here as well, Jackson has been having a monster season
WR1:Fitz vs Bowe- Team 1 has advantage, although not by much
WR2: Marshall vs Boldin- Team 1 has advantage (not a Marshall fan but is better than Boldin)
TE: Graham vs Finely- Both are top of the line TE's- although Finely hasn't been producing that much since his 3 TD explosion. Would prefer Graham
DST: Steelers/49ers vs Ravens- Would say usually that DST is irrelevant, although in this case the Ravens have been great this year and have produced nicely- advantage team 3
K: Janikowski vs Bailey- Although Janikowski has been argurably best K, this postion is completely irrelevant in my eyes
Bench: I think I would much prefer team 3's bench, not much usefullness on team team 1's bench other than A.J. Green

I just think that team 3's RB core is vastly superior to team 1's, and would probably carry them- team 3 also has the option to deal Best for help at the 2nd WR spot. However, I would not complain at all being 6-0 with that nice roster so the OP should be in great shape.
Weasel_King
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar
Pick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 688
(Past Year: 18)
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby Weasel_King » Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:19 am

Oh I'd rate them 2, 3, then 1
Weasel_King
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar
Pick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 688
(Past Year: 18)
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby aerathi » Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:47 am

I don't disagree on any particular point, and to be completely honest I ignored the benches. Which I know is a big no no.

I guess the only *one slight* disagreement I'd have is that Foster and Peterson do look the same, but foster had a whole extra month of rest; and besides last week he came out of the gates sprinting.

But your right, it's still about even there. I mean Adrian Peterson is Adrian Peterson, and should get the edge (albeit slight imo).

OP though, you still got a good shot. No naysaying here!
aerathi
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 53
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby Weasel_King » Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:57 am

aerathi wrote:I don't disagree on any particular point, and to be completely honest I ignored the benches. Which I know is a big no no.

I guess the only *one slight* disagreement I'd have is that Foster and Peterson do look the same, but foster had a whole extra month of rest; and besides last week he came out of the gates sprinting.

But your right, it's still about even there. I mean Adrian Peterson is Adrian Peterson, and should get the edge (albeit slight imo).

OP though, you still got a good shot. No naysaying here!


I agree, Foster has had the extra time to rest which helped keep him fresh. And even though I believe that Adrian Peterson is the best back in the game, the fact that he is on the Vikings (with McNabb especially, we'll see how much better Ponder fairs) hurts his production. I could easily see Foster out-producing Peterson for the rest of the season and as a Foster owner, I would not be disappointed by this at all. Although he is over his injury, little concerned if it could potentially come up again. Also, with the way that Tate has produced- very effective in the chances he has been given, I would not be suprised if they started giving Tate a little more than pure back-up carries which would hurt Foster's value. So I would rate Peterson a little higher than Foster but would agree that it is pretty close, and Foster does have a decent chance to outproduce Peterson from here on out.
Weasel_King
Offensive Coordinator
Offensive Coordinator

User avatar
Pick 3 Weekly Winner
Posts: 688
(Past Year: 18)
Joined: 24 Apr 2006
Home Cafe: Football

Re: 6-0 Championship or luckbox?? WHir 100%

Postby aerathi » Thu Oct 20, 2011 2:43 am

Weasel_King wrote:
aerathi wrote:I don't disagree on any particular point, and to be completely honest I ignored the benches. Which I know is a big no no.

I guess the only *one slight* disagreement I'd have is that Foster and Peterson do look the same, but foster had a whole extra month of rest; and besides last week he came out of the gates sprinting.

But your right, it's still about even there. I mean Adrian Peterson is Adrian Peterson, and should get the edge (albeit slight imo).

OP though, you still got a good shot. No naysaying here!


I agree, Foster has had the extra time to rest which helped keep him fresh. And even though I believe that Adrian Peterson is the best back in the game, the fact that he is on the Vikings (with McNabb especially, we'll see how much better Ponder fairs) hurts his production. I could easily see Foster out-producing Peterson for the rest of the season and as a Foster owner, I would not be disappointed by this at all. Although he is over his injury, little concerned if it could potentially come up again. Also, with the way that Tate has produced- very effective in the chances he has been given, I would not be suprised if they started giving Tate a little more than pure back-up carries which would hurt Foster's value. So I would rate Peterson a little higher than Foster but would agree that it is pretty close, and Foster does have a decent chance to outproduce Peterson from here on out.


I know I posted this above, but would you mind taking a look at my situation? viewtopic.php?t=504699

I don't want to break any forum rules or anything. You just know what you're talking about and I'd love your input.
aerathi
Water Boy
Water Boy


Posts: 53
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Home Cafe: Football

Next

Return to Roster Ratings

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron
Forums Articles & Tips Start & Sit Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Get Ready...
The 2014 NFL season kicks off in 16:49 hours
(and 43 days)
2014 NFL Schedule


  • Fantasy Football
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact